linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH] MAINTAINERS: Remove bouncing email of Beniamin Bia

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20200902144220.000021f8@Huawei.com>
Date:   Wed, 2 Sep 2020 14:42:20 +0100
From:   Jonathan Cameron <Jonathan.Cameron@...wei.com>
To:     Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzk@...nel.org>
CC:     Andy Shevchenko <andy.shevchenko@...il.com>,
        "Ardelean, Alexandru" <alexandru.Ardelean@...log.com>,
        Jonathan Cameron <jic23@...nel.org>,
        Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        "Hennerich, Michael" <Michael.Hennerich@...log.com>,
        linux-iio <linux-iio@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] MAINTAINERS: Remove bouncing email of Beniamin Bia

On Wed, 2 Sep 2020 15:35:45 +0200
Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzk@...nel.org> wrote:

> On Wed, 2 Sep 2020 at 15:28, Jonathan Cameron
> <Jonathan.Cameron@...wei.com> wrote:
> >
> > On Wed, 2 Sep 2020 10:49:04 +0300
> > Andy Shevchenko <andy.shevchenko@...il.com> wrote:
> >  
> > > On Wed, Sep 2, 2020 at 8:56 AM Ardelean, Alexandru
> > > <alexandru.Ardelean@...log.com> wrote:  
> > > >
> > > > [yes, I know, bad-email format, but I wanted this to come from my work email]
> > > >
> > > > Apologies also for the delay here. Things pile-up on my side and I defer things a bit.
> > > >
> > > > Talked to Michael Hennerich about this [since he's the more senior contact at Analog].
> > > > We can replace the email from Beniamin Bia with Michael's.
> > > > Or, we can remove the "Orphan" blocks and just have the catch-all "drivers/iio/*/ad*" cover this driver and others that were upstreamed by Beniamin.
> > > >
> > > > Either option is fine from us.  
> > >
> > > As a participant of activity to put MAINTAINERS in some order, I
> > > prefer to have similar blocks be squashed.
> > > If there will be a dedicated maintainer for a certain driver in the
> > > future, we can always split into separate sections.
> > >
> > > So, something like
> > > ANALOG DEVICES ADC (I guess it makes sense to have some grouping still)
> > > ...
> > > F: .../ad1234
> > > F: .../ad2345
> > >
> > > In one section (no need to have wildcards right now).
> > >  
> >
> > ANALOG DEVICES INC IIO DRIVERS
> > M:      Lars-Peter Clausen <lars@...afoo.de>
> > M:      Michael Hennerich <Michael.Hennerich@...log.com>
> > S:      Supported
> > W:      http://wiki.analog.com/
> > W:      http://ez.analog.com/community/linux-device-drivers
> > F:      Documentation/ABI/testing/sysfs-bus-iio-frequency-ad9523
> > F:      Documentation/ABI/testing/sysfs-bus-iio-frequency-adf4350
> > F:      drivers/iio/*/ad*
> > F:      drivers/iio/adc/ltc249*
> > F:      drivers/staging/iio/*/ad*
> > X:      drivers/iio/*/adjd*
> >
> > Already exists.  We could potentially clean that up.
> >
> > For the block that started this thread, we can just drop it.  
> 
> I can send a follow up to merge/remove the entries.
> 
> Best regards,
> Krzysztof

Great thanks

Jonathan