[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <3c5840d3a827ccae575fc73d1aa4ed9f523c46b8.camel@linux.ibm.com>
Date: Wed, 02 Sep 2020 09:40:51 -0400
From: Mimi Zohar <zohar@...ux.ibm.com>
To: Roberto Sassu <roberto.sassu@...wei.com>,
"mjg59@...gle.com" <mjg59@...gle.com>, Petr Vorel <pvorel@...e.cz>
Cc: "linux-integrity@...r.kernel.org" <linux-integrity@...r.kernel.org>,
"linux-security-module@...r.kernel.org"
<linux-security-module@...r.kernel.org>,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
"stable@...r.kernel.org" <stable@...r.kernel.org>,
Silviu Vlasceanu <Silviu.Vlasceanu@...wei.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 01/11] evm: Execute evm_inode_init_security() only when
the HMAC key is loaded
On Wed, 2020-09-02 at 11:42 +0000, Roberto Sassu wrote:
> > From: Mimi Zohar [mailto:zohar@...ux.ibm.com]
> > Sent: Monday, August 24, 2020 7:45 PM
> > Hi Roberto,
> >
> > On Fri, 2020-08-21 at 14:30 -0400, Mimi Zohar wrote:
> > > Sorry for the delay in reviewing these patches. Missing from this
> > > patch set is a cover letter with an explanation for grouping these
> > > patches into a patch set, other than for convenience. In this case, it
> > > would be along the lines that the original use case for EVM portable
> > > and immutable keys support was for a few critical files, not combined
> > > with an EVM encrypted key type. This patch set more fully integrates
> > > the initial EVM portable and immutable signature support.
> >
> > Thank you for more fully integrating the EVM portable signatures into
> > IMA.
> >
> > " [PATCH 08/11] ima: Allow imasig requirement to be satisfied by EVM
> > portable signatures" equates an IMA signature to having a portable and
> > immutable EVM signature. That is true in terms of signature
> > verification, but from an attestation perspective the "ima-sig"
> > template will not contain a signature. If not the EVM signature, then
> > at least some other indication should be included in the measurement
> > list.
>
> Would it be ok to print the EVM portable signature in the sig field if the IMA
> signature is not found? Later we can introduce the new template evm-sig
> to include all metadata necessary to verify the EVM portable signature.
As long as the attestation server can differentiate between the
signature types, including the EVM signature should be fine.
>
> > Are you planning on posting the associated IMA/EVM regression tests?
>
> I didn't have a look yet at the code. I will try to write some later.
It looks like ima_verify_signature() in ima-evm-utils could be extended
to support the EVM portable signature or at least not to fail the
signature verification.
Mimi
Powered by blists - more mailing lists