lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date:   Wed, 2 Sep 2020 09:08:34 -0500
From:   Nishanth Menon <nm@...com>
To:     <santosh.shilimkar@...cle.com>
CC:     Grygorii Strashko <grygorii.strashko@...com>,
        Peter Ujfalusi <peter.ujfalusi@...com>,
        Santosh Shilimkar <ssantosh@...nel.org>,
        Tero Kristo <t-kristo@...com>,
        Rob Herring <robh+dt@...nel.org>,
        Vignesh Raghavendra <vigneshr@...com>,
        <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        <linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>,
        Sekhar Nori <nsekhar@...com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH next v2 0/3] soc: ti: k3: ringacc: add am65x sr2.0 support

On 11:34-20200831, santosh.shilimkar@...cle.com wrote:
> On 8/29/20 11:41 AM, Grygorii Strashko wrote:
> > Hi Santosh,
> > 
> > I've rebased on top of  linux-next and identified merge conflict of patch 3
> > with commit 6da45875fa17 ("arm64: dts: k3-am65: Update the RM resource types")
> > in -next.
> > 
> > ---
> > This series adds support for the TI AM65x SR2.0 SoC Ringacc which has fixed
> > errata i2023 "RINGACC, UDMA: RINGACC and UDMA Ring State Interoperability
> > Issue after Channel Teardown". This errata also fixed for J271E SoC.
> > The SOC bus chipinfo data is used to identify the SoC and configure
> > i2023 errata W/A.
> > 
> > This changes made "ti,dma-ring-reset-quirk" DT property obsolete, so it's removed.
> > 
> > Changes in v2:
> >   - no functional changes
> >   - rebased on top of linux-next
> >   - added ask from Rob Herring
> > 
> Thanks. Can you please followup DT acks for PRUSS series so that I can
> apply PRUSS + $subject series.


Santosh, in this series, may i suggest that the dtsi changes[1] be hosted
on my tree? else we are going to create a mix of rc1 and rc3 branches
which is going to be irritating, to say the least.

I will pick [1] the day after I see the patches 1 and 2 in linux-next tag.

[1] https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/20200829184139.15547-4-grygorii.strashko@ti.com/

-- 
Regards,
Nishanth Menon
Key (0xDDB5849D1736249D) / Fingerprint: F8A2 8693 54EB 8232 17A3  1A34 DDB5 849D 1736 249D

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ