linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v5 4/5] arch_topology, cpufreq: constify arch

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20200902132530.GE25462@bogus>
Date:   Wed, 2 Sep 2020 14:25:30 +0100
From:   Sudeep Holla <sudeep.holla@....com>
To:     Ionela Voinescu <ionela.voinescu@....com>
Cc:     rjw@...ysocki.net, viresh.kumar@...aro.org,
        dietmar.eggemann@....com, catalin.marinas@....com, will@...nel.org,
        valentin.schneider@....com, linux-pm@...r.kernel.org,
        linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v5 4/5] arch_topology, cpufreq: constify arch_* cpumasks

On Tue, Sep 01, 2020 at 09:55:48PM +0100, Ionela Voinescu wrote:
> From: Valentin Schneider <valentin.schneider@....com>
>
> The passed cpumask arguments to arch_set_freq_scale() and
> arch_freq_counters_available() are only iterated over, so reflect this
> in the prototype. This also allows to pass system cpumasks like
> cpu_online_mask without getting a warning.
>
> Signed-off-by: Valentin Schneider <valentin.schneider@....com>
> Signed-off-by: Ionela Voinescu <ionela.voinescu@....com>
> Acked-by: Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@....com>
> Acked-by: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@...aro.org>
> Cc: Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@....com>
> Cc: Will Deacon <will@...nel.org>
> Cc: Sudeep Holla <sudeep.holla@....com>

Reviewed-by: Sudeep Holla <sudeep.holla@....com>

--
Regards,
Sudeep