linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH V5 0/4] Signaling api support in glink/rpmsg clients

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <5ce032b8-6b26-d0a7-f92d-f8487d810f0c@codeaurora.org>
Date:   Wed, 2 Sep 2020 22:00:33 +0530
From:   Deepak Kumar Singh <deesin@...eaurora.org>
To:     Mathieu Poirier <mathieu.poirier@...aro.org>
Cc:     bjorn.andersson@...aro.org, clew@...eaurora.org,
        linux-arm-msm@...r.kernel.org, linux-remoteproc@...r.kernel.org,
        linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH V5 0/4] Signaling api support in glink/rpmsg clients


On 7/6/2020 11:34 PM, Mathieu Poirier wrote:
> Hi Deepak,
>
> On Fri, Jun 26, 2020 at 08:16:55PM +0530, Deepak Kumar Singh wrote:
>> Change from version 5
>> [V5,4/4] rpmsg: char: Add signal callback and POLLPRI support
>> Updated for sparse warning. Replaced POLLPRI => EPOLLPRI to fix
>> warning.
>>
>> Change from version 4
>> I am taking over these patches from aneela@...eaurora.org
>> Fixed all the trivial review comments.
>>
>> Signal conversion to and from native signal as done in patch V4,2/4
>> is intentional.
>>
>> Arun Kumar Neelakantam (3):
>>    rpmsg: glink: Add support to handle signals command
>>    rpmsg: char: Add TIOCMGET/TIOCMSET ioctl support
>>    rpmsg: char: Add signal callback and POLLPRI support
>>
>> Deepak Kumar Singh (1):
>>    rpmsg: core: Add signal API support
> I'm confused here - V5 (or what I think it is) was sent out on June 24th without
> a cover letter.  This set has a cover letter but it is labeled V5.  So is this
> the cover letter that should have been sent out on the 24th and the content
> herein relevent to that set?  Or is it accurate and the label on the cover
> letter of this set is wrong and should have been V6?
>
> I have little confidence in both sets and as such won't be reviewing them.
> Please send a new revision that is properly labeled.
>
> Thanks,
> Mathieu
>
Mistakenly i forgot to update label for cover letter to V6.

I have uploaded patch set V7 with updated cover letter.

There is no change in patches.

>>   drivers/rpmsg/qcom_glink_native.c | 125 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
>>   drivers/rpmsg/rpmsg_char.c        |  76 ++++++++++++++++++++++-
>>   drivers/rpmsg/rpmsg_core.c        |  40 ++++++++++++
>>   drivers/rpmsg/rpmsg_internal.h    |   5 ++
>>   include/linux/rpmsg.h             |  27 ++++++++
>>   5 files changed, 270 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
>>
>> -- 
>> The Qualcomm Innovation Center, Inc. is a member of the Code Aurora Forum,
>> a Linux Foundation Collaborative Project
>>
-- 
The Qualcomm Innovation Center, Inc. is a member of the Code Aurora Forum, a Linux Foundation Collaborative Project