lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20200903212310.17990-5-ben.levinsky@xilinx.com>
Date:   Thu,  3 Sep 2020 14:23:09 -0700
From:   Ben Levinsky <ben.levinsky@...inx.com>
To:     punit1.agrawal@...hiba.co.jp, stefanos@...inx.com,
        michals@...inx.com
Cc:     michael.auchter@...com, devicetree@...r.kernel.org,
        mathieu.poirier@...aro.org, emooring@...inx.com,
        linux-remoteproc@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
        jliang@...inx.com, robh+dt@...nel.org,
        linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org, Jason Wu <j.wu@...inx.com>,
        Michal Simek <michal.simek@...inx.com>
Subject: [PATCH v12 4/5] dt-bindings: remoteproc: Add documentation for ZynqMP R5 rproc bindings

Add binding for ZynqMP R5 OpenAMP.

Represent the RPU domain resources in one device node. Each RPU
processor is a subnode of the top RPU domain node.

Signed-off-by: Jason Wu <j.wu@...inx.com>
Signed-off-by: Wendy Liang <jliang@...inx.com>
Signed-off-by: Michal Simek <michal.simek@...inx.com>

Signed-off-by: Ben Levinsky <ben.levinsky@...inx.com>
---
v3:
- update zynqmp_r5 yaml parsing to not raise warnings for extra
  information in children of R5 node. The warning "node has a unit
  name, but no reg or ranges property" will still be raised though 
  as this particular node is needed to describe the
  '#address-cells' and '#size-cells' information.
v4::
- remove warning '/example-0/rpu@...a0000/r5@0: 
  node has a unit name, but no reg or ranges property'
  by adding reg to r5 node.
v5:
- update device tree sample and yaml parsing to not raise any warnings
- description for memory-region in yaml parsing
- compatible string in yaml parsing for TCM
v6:
- remove coupling TCM nodes with remoteproc 
- remove mailbox as it is optional not needed
v7:
- change lockstep-mode to xlnx,cluster-mode
v9:
- show example IPC nodes and tcm bank nodes
v11:
- add property meta-memory-regions to illustrate link
  between r5 and TCM banks
- update so no warnings from 'make dt_binding_check'
---
 .../xilinx,zynqmp-r5-remoteproc.yaml          | 123 ++++++++++++++++++
 1 file changed, 123 insertions(+)
 create mode 100644 Documentation/devicetree/bindings/remoteproc/xilinx,zynqmp-r5-remoteproc.yaml

diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/remoteproc/xilinx,zynqmp-r5-remoteproc.yaml b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/remoteproc/xilinx,zynqmp-r5-remoteproc.yaml
new file mode 100644
index 000000000000..148374c61908
--- /dev/null
+++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/remoteproc/xilinx,zynqmp-r5-remoteproc.yaml
@@ -0,0 +1,123 @@
+# SPDX-License-Identifier: (GPL-2.0 OR BSD-2-Clause)
+%YAML 1.2
+---
+$id: "http://devicetree.org/schemas/remoteproc/xilinx,zynqmp-r5-remoteproc.yaml#"
+$schema: "http://devicetree.org/meta-schemas/core.yaml#"
+
+title: Xilinx R5 remote processor controller bindings
+
+description:
+  This document defines the binding for the remoteproc component that loads and
+  boots firmwares on the Xilinx Zynqmp and Versal family chipset.
+
+  Note that the Linux has global addressing view of the R5-related memory (TCM)
+  so the absolute address ranges are provided in TCM reg's.
+maintainers:
+  - Ed Mooring <ed.mooring@...inx.com>
+  - Ben Levinsky <ben.levinsky@...inx.com>
+
+properties:
+  compatible:
+    const: "xlnx,zynqmp-r5-remoteproc-1.0"
+
+  lockstep-mode:
+    description:
+      R5 core configuration (split is 0 or lock-step and 1)
+    maxItems: 1
+
+  interrupts:
+    description:
+      Interrupt mapping for remoteproc IPI. It is required if the
+      user uses the remoteproc driver with the RPMsg kernel driver.
+    maxItems: 6
+
+  memory-region:
+    description:
+      collection of memory carveouts used for elf-loading and inter-processor
+      communication.
+    maxItems: 4
+    minItems: 4
+  meta-memory-regions:
+    description:
+      collection of memories that are not present in the top level memory
+      nodes' mapping. For example, R5s' TCM banks. These banks are needed
+      for R5 firmware meta data such as the R5 firmware's heap and stack
+  pnode-id:
+    maxItems: 1
+  mboxes:
+    maxItems: 2
+  mbox-names:
+    maxItems: 2
+
+examples:
+  - |
+     reserved-memory {
+          #address-cells = <1>;
+          #size-cells = <1>;
+          ranges;
+          elf_load: rproc@...000000 {
+               no-map;
+               reg = <0x3ed00000 0x40000>;
+          };
+     };
+     rpu {
+          compatible = "xlnx,zynqmp-r5-remoteproc-1.0";
+          #address-cells = <1>;
+          #size-cells = <1>;
+          ranges;
+          lockstep-mode = <0>;
+          r5_0 {
+               ranges;
+               #address-cells = <1>;
+               #size-cells = <1>;
+               memory-region = <&elf_load>;
+               meta-memory-regions = <0x40 0x41>;
+               pnode-id = <0x7>;
+          };
+     };
+
+     /*
+      * Below nodes are required if using TCM to load R5 firmware
+      * if not, then either do not provide nodes are label as disabled in
+      * status property
+      */
+     tcm_0a@...00000 {
+         reg = <0xffe00000 0x10000>;
+         pnode-id = <0xf>;
+         no-map;
+         status = "okay";
+         phandle = <0x40>;
+         compatible = "xlnx,tcm";
+     };
+     tcm_1a@...20000 {
+         reg = <0xffe20000 0x10000>;
+         pnode-id = <0x10>;
+         no-map;
+         status = "okay";
+         compatible = "xlnx,tcm";
+         phandle = <0x41>;
+     };
+
+     /*
+      * Below nodes are required for IPC, as Xilinx Kernel
+      * can potentially have other applications that use CMA
+      * and conflict from hardware design. With that in mind,
+      * explicitly state the address spaces for the IPC remoteproc
+      * mechanisms.
+      *
+      * If IPC not required and only elf-loading then these are not needed.
+      */
+     rpu0vdev0vring0: rpu0vdev0vring0@...40000 {
+         no-map;
+         reg = <0x3ed40000 0x4000>;
+     };
+     rpu0vdev0vring1: rpu0vdev0vring1@...44000 {
+         no-map;
+         reg = <0x3ed44000 0x4000>;
+     };
+     rpu0vdev0buffer: rpu0vdev0buffer@...48000 {
+         no-map;
+         reg = <0x3ed48000 0x100000>;
+     };
+
+...
-- 
2.17.1

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ