[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <87y2lqy1r9.fsf@morokweng.localdomain>
Date: Thu, 03 Sep 2020 18:43:54 -0300
From: Thiago Jung Bauermann <bauerman@...ux.ibm.com>
To: Lakshmi Ramasubramanian <nramas@...ux.microsoft.com>
Cc: zohar@...ux.ibm.com, robh@...nel.org, gregkh@...uxfoundation.org,
james.morse@....com, catalin.marinas@....com, sashal@...nel.org,
will@...nel.org, mpe@...erman.id.au, benh@...nel.crashing.org,
paulus@...ba.org, robh+dt@...nel.org, frowand.list@...il.com,
vincenzo.frascino@....com, mark.rutland@....com,
dmitry.kasatkin@...il.com, jmorris@...ei.org, serge@...lyn.com,
pasha.tatashin@...een.com, allison@...utok.net,
kstewart@...uxfoundation.org, takahiro.akashi@...aro.org,
tglx@...utronix.de, masahiroy@...nel.org, bhsharma@...hat.com,
mbrugger@...e.com, hsinyi@...omium.org, tao.li@...o.com,
christophe.leroy@....fr, linux-integrity@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, devicetree@...r.kernel.org,
prsriva@...ux.microsoft.com, balajib@...ux.microsoft.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v5 1/3] powerpc: Refactor kexec functions to move arch
independent code to IMA
Lakshmi Ramasubramanian <nramas@...ux.microsoft.com> writes:
> The functions ima_get_kexec_buffer() and ima_free_kexec_buffer() that
> handle carrying forward the IMA measurement logs on kexec for powerpc
> do not have architecture specific code, but they are currently defined
> for powerpc only.
>
> Move these functions to IMA subsystem so that it can be used for other
> architectures as well. A later patch in this series will use these
> functions for carrying forward the IMA measurement log for ARM64.
>
> Define FDT_PROP_IMA_KEXEC_BUFFER for the chosen node, namely
> "linux,ima-kexec-buffer", that is added to the DTB to hold
> the address and the size of the memory reserved to carry
> the IMA measurement log.
>
> Co-developed-by: Prakhar Srivastava <prsriva@...ux.microsoft.com>
> Signed-off-by: Prakhar Srivastava <prsriva@...ux.microsoft.com>
> Signed-off-by: Lakshmi Ramasubramanian <nramas@...ux.microsoft.com>
do_get_kexec_buffer() is still duplicated in generic code and powerpc
code. It's a small and simple function though, so not really a problem.
I think you'll need to move over remove_ima_buffer() if you agree with
the comment I'll make on patch 3, in which case the powerpc-specific
do_get_kexec_buffer() can be removed.
Reviewed-by: Thiago Jung Bauermann <bauerman@...ux.ibm.com>
--
Thiago Jung Bauermann
IBM Linux Technology Center
Powered by blists - more mailing lists