linux-kernel - [PATCH RESEND 0/2] Common protected-clocks implementation

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-Id: <20200903040015.5627-1-samuel@sholland.org>
Date:   Wed,  2 Sep 2020 23:00:13 -0500
From:   Samuel Holland <samuel@...lland.org>
To:     Stephen Boyd <sboyd@...nel.org>,
        Michael Turquette <mturquette@...libre.com>,
        Andy Gross <agross@...nel.org>,
        Bjorn Andersson <bjorn.andersson@...aro.org>,
        Maxime Ripard <mripard@...nel.org>
Cc:     linux-arm-msm@...r.kernel.org, linux-clk@...r.kernel.org,
        linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, Samuel Holland <samuel@...lland.org>
Subject: [PATCH RESEND 0/2] Common protected-clocks implementation

Stephen, Maxime,

You previously asked me to implement the protected-clocks property in a
driver-independent way:

https://www.spinics.net/lists/arm-kernel/msg753832.html

I provided an implementation 6 months ago, which I am resending now:

https://patchwork.kernel.org/patch/11398629/

Do you have any comments on it?

Thanks,
Samuel

Samuel Holland (2):
  clk: Implement protected-clocks for all OF clock providers
  Revert "clk: qcom: Support 'protected-clocks' property"

 drivers/clk/clk-conf.c    | 54 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
 drivers/clk/clk.c         | 31 ++++++++++++++++++++++
 drivers/clk/clk.h         |  2 ++
 drivers/clk/qcom/common.c | 18 -------------
 4 files changed, 87 insertions(+), 18 deletions(-)

-- 
2.26.2