[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20200903065613.GA18731@lst.de>
Date: Thu, 3 Sep 2020 08:56:13 +0200
From: Christoph Hellwig <hch@....de>
To: Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@....com>
Cc: Christoph Hellwig <hch@....de>,
Josh Poimboeuf <jpoimboe@...hat.com>, x86@...nel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>,
Al Viro <viro@...iv.linux.org.uk>,
Will Deacon <will@...nel.org>,
Dan Williams <dan.j.williams@...el.com>,
Andrea Arcangeli <aarcange@...hat.com>,
Waiman Long <longman@...hat.com>,
Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
Andrew Cooper <andrew.cooper3@...rix.com>,
Andy Lutomirski <luto@...nel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] x86/uaccess: Use pointer masking to limit uaccess
speculation
On Wed, Sep 02, 2020 at 06:23:30PM +0100, Mark Rutland wrote:
> I've pushed an initial/incomplete/WIP stab (just the kernel accessors)
> to:
>
> https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/mark/linux.git/log/?h=arm64/set_fs-removal
Thanks!
> ... and doing that made it clear that the necessary arm64 rework is a
> bit more fractal than I thought (e.g. SDEI bits), so it might be a short
> while before I post a series.
SDEI is just forcing back a KERNEL_DS to a normal USER_DS, isn't it?
>
> It might be handy to have a stable branch with the common bits so that
> the arm64 rework could go via the arm64 tree in case there's any
> fallout.
The series will need at least one more repost, but hopefully I'll have
s stable branch soon.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists