linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 22/28] sgiseeq: convert from dma_cache_sync to dma_sync_single_for

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20200903084226.GA24410@lst.de>
Date:   Thu, 3 Sep 2020 10:42:26 +0200
From:   Christoph Hellwig <hch@....de>
To:     Thomas Bogendoerfer <tsbogend@...ha.franken.de>
Cc:     Christoph Hellwig <hch@....de>, alsa-devel@...a-project.org,
        linux-ia64@...r.kernel.org, linux-doc@...r.kernel.org,
        nouveau@...ts.freedesktop.org, linux-nvme@...ts.infradead.org,
        linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
        "James E.J. Bottomley" <James.Bottomley@...senPartnership.com>,
        linux-mm@...ck.org, Marek Szyprowski <m.szyprowski@...sung.com>,
        linux-samsung-soc@...r.kernel.org,
        Joonyoung Shim <jy0922.shim@...sung.com>,
        linux-scsi@...r.kernel.org,
        Kyungmin Park <kyungmin.park@...sung.com>,
        Ben Skeggs <bskeggs@...hat.com>,
        Matt Porter <mporter@...nel.crashing.org>,
        linux-media@...r.kernel.org,
        Tom Lendacky <thomas.lendacky@....com>,
        Pawel Osciak <pawel@...iak.com>,
        Mauro Carvalho Chehab <mchehab@...nel.org>,
        linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org, linux-parisc@...r.kernel.org,
        netdev@...r.kernel.org, Seung-Woo Kim <sw0312.kim@...sung.com>,
        linux-mips@...r.kernel.org, iommu@...ts.linux-foundation.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 22/28] sgiseeq: convert from dma_cache_sync to
 dma_sync_single_for_device

On Wed, Sep 02, 2020 at 11:38:09PM +0200, Thomas Bogendoerfer wrote:
> the patch below fixes the problem.

But is very wrong unfortunately.

>  static inline void dma_sync_desc_cpu(struct net_device *dev, void *addr)
>  {
> -       dma_cache_sync(dev->dev.parent, addr, sizeof(struct sgiseeq_rx_desc),
> -                      DMA_FROM_DEVICE);
> +       struct sgiseeq_private *sp = netdev_priv(dev);
> +
> +       dma_sync_single_for_device(dev->dev.parent, VIRT_TO_DMA(sp, addr),
> +                       sizeof(struct sgiseeq_rx_desc), DMA_FROM_DEVICE);
>  }
>  
>  static inline void dma_sync_desc_dev(struct net_device *dev, void *addr)
>  {
> -       dma_cache_sync(dev->dev.parent, addr, sizeof(struct sgiseeq_rx_desc),
> -                      DMA_TO_DEVICE);
> +       struct sgiseeq_private *sp = netdev_priv(dev);
> +
> +       dma_sync_single_for_device(dev->dev.parent, VIRT_TO_DMA(sp, addr),
> +                       sizeof(struct sgiseeq_rx_desc), DMA_TO_DEVICE);

This is not how the DMA API works.  You can only call
dma_sync_single_for_{device,cpu} with the direction that the memory
was mapped.  It then transfer ownership to the device or the cpu,
and the ownership of the memory is a fundamental concept that allows
for reasoning about the caching interaction.

>  }
>  
> -- 
> Crap can work. Given enough thrust pigs will fly, but it's not necessarily a
> good idea.                                                [ RFC1925, 2.3 ]
---end quoted text---