[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20200903110509.4542cdad@coco.lan>
Date: Thu, 3 Sep 2020 11:05:09 +0200
From: Mauro Carvalho Chehab <mchehab@...nel.org>
To: Andy Shevchenko <andy.shevchenko@...il.com>
Cc: Colin King <colin.king@...onical.com>,
Sakari Ailus <sakari.ailus@...ux.intel.com>,
Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@...aro.org>,
Linux Media Mailing List <linux-media@...r.kernel.org>,
"open list:STAGING SUBSYSTEM" <devel@...verdev.osuosl.org>,
kernel-janitors@...r.kernel.org,
Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH][next] staging: media: atomisp: fix memory leak of
object flash
Em Wed, 2 Sep 2020 21:15:31 +0300
Andy Shevchenko <andy.shevchenko@...il.com> escreveu:
> On Wed, Sep 2, 2020 at 8:02 PM Colin King <colin.king@...onical.com> wrote:
> >
> > From: Colin Ian King <colin.king@...onical.com>
> >
> > In the case where the call to lm3554_platform_data_func returns an
> > error there is a memory leak on the error return path of object
> > flash. Fix this by adding an error return path that will free
> > flash and rename labels fail2 to fail3 and fail1 to fail2.
> >
>
> Wouldn't be proper fix to move to devm_kmalloc() and return
> dev_err_probe() where appropriate?
Actually, we prefer not using devm_*() at media subsystem.
Once we started migrating alloc stuff to use it. We end needing
to revert those, as it caused side effects related to lifecycle
management: some object were de-allocating too late. Others
with multiple interfaces (USB, pci) had even worse troubles.
Thanks,
Mauro
Powered by blists - more mailing lists