Message-ID: <159912678646.20229.14512202252477216460.tip-bot2@tip-bot2>
Date:   Thu, 03 Sep 2020 09:53:06 -0000
From:   "tip-bot2 for Joerg Roedel" <tip-bot2@...utronix.de>
To:     linux-tip-commits@...r.kernel.org
Cc:     Naresh Kamboju <naresh.kamboju@...aro.org>,
        Joerg Roedel <jroedel@...e.de>, Ingo Molnar <mingo@...nel.org>,
        x86 <x86@...nel.org>, LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: [tip: x86/urgent] x86/mm/32: Bring back vmalloc faulting on x86_32

The following commit has been merged into the x86/urgent branch of tip:

Commit-ID:     4819e15f740ec884a50bdc431d7f1e7638b6f7d9
Gitweb:        https://git.kernel.org/tip/4819e15f740ec884a50bdc431d7f1e7638b6f7d9
Author:        Joerg Roedel <jroedel@...e.de>
AuthorDate:    Wed, 02 Sep 2020 17:59:04 +02:00
Committer:     Ingo Molnar <mingo@...nel.org>
CommitterDate: Thu, 03 Sep 2020 11:23:35 +02:00

x86/mm/32: Bring back vmalloc faulting on x86_32

One can not simply remove vmalloc faulting on x86-32. Upstream

	commit: 7f0a002b5a21 ("x86/mm: remove vmalloc faulting")

removed it on x86 alltogether because previously the
arch_sync_kernel_mappings() interface was introduced. This interface
added synchronization of vmalloc/ioremap page-table updates to all
page-tables in the system at creation time and was thought to make
vmalloc faulting obsolete.

But that assumption was incredibly naive.

It turned out that there is a race window between the time the vmalloc
or ioremap code establishes a mapping and the time it synchronizes
this change to other page-tables in the system.

During this race window another CPU or thread can establish a vmalloc
mapping which uses the same intermediate page-table entries (e.g. PMD
or PUD) and does no synchronization in the end, because it found all
necessary mappings already present in the kernel reference page-table.

But when these intermediate page-table entries are not yet
synchronized, the other CPU or thread will continue with a vmalloc
address that is not yet mapped in the page-table it currently uses,
causing an unhandled page fault and oops like below:

	BUG: unable to handle page fault for address: fe80c000
	#PF: supervisor write access in kernel mode
	#PF: error_code(0x0002) - not-present page
	*pde = 33183067 *pte = a8648163
	Oops: 0002 [#1] SMP
	CPU: 1 PID: 13514 Comm: cve-2017-17053 Tainted: G
	...
	Call Trace:
	 ldt_dup_context+0x66/0x80
	 dup_mm+0x2b3/0x480
	 copy_process+0x133b/0x15c0
	 _do_fork+0x94/0x3e0
	 __ia32_sys_clone+0x67/0x80
	 __do_fast_syscall_32+0x3f/0x70
	 do_fast_syscall_32+0x29/0x60
	 do_SYSENTER_32+0x15/0x20
	 entry_SYSENTER_32+0x9f/0xf2
	EIP: 0xb7eef549

So the arch_sync_kernel_mappings() interface is racy, but removing it
would mean to re-introduce the vmalloc_sync_all() interface, which is
even more awful. Keep arch_sync_kernel_mappings() in place and catch
the race condition in the page-fault handler instead.

Do a partial revert of above commit to get vmalloc faulting on x86-32
back in place.

Fixes: 7f0a002b5a21 ("x86/mm: remove vmalloc faulting")
Reported-by: Naresh Kamboju <naresh.kamboju@...aro.org>
Signed-off-by: Joerg Roedel <jroedel@...e.de>
Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@...nel.org>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20200902155904.17544-1-joro@8bytes.org
---
 arch/x86/mm/fault.c | 78 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++-
 1 file changed, 78 insertions(+)

diff --git a/arch/x86/mm/fault.c b/arch/x86/mm/fault.c
index 35f1498..6e3e8a1 100644
--- a/arch/x86/mm/fault.c
+++ b/arch/x86/mm/fault.c
@@ -190,6 +190,53 @@ static inline pmd_t *vmalloc_sync_one(pgd_t *pgd, unsigned long address)
 	return pmd_k;
 }
 
+/*
+ *   Handle a fault on the vmalloc or module mapping area
+ *
+ *   This is needed because there is a race condition between the time
+ *   when the vmalloc mapping code updates the PMD to the point in time
+ *   where it synchronizes this update with the other page-tables in the
+ *   system.
+ *
+ *   In this race window another thread/CPU can map an area on the same
+ *   PMD, finds it already present and does not synchronize it with the
+ *   rest of the system yet. As a result v[mz]alloc might return areas
+ *   which are not mapped in every page-table in the system, causing an
+ *   unhandled page-fault when they are accessed.
+ */
+static noinline int vmalloc_fault(unsigned long address)
+{
+	unsigned long pgd_paddr;
+	pmd_t *pmd_k;
+	pte_t *pte_k;
+
+	/* Make sure we are in vmalloc area: */
+	if (!(address >= VMALLOC_START && address < VMALLOC_END))
+		return -1;
+
+	/*
+	 * Synchronize this task's top level page-table
+	 * with the 'reference' page table.
+	 *
+	 * Do _not_ use "current" here. We might be inside
+	 * an interrupt in the middle of a task switch..
+	 */
+	pgd_paddr = read_cr3_pa();
+	pmd_k = vmalloc_sync_one(__va(pgd_paddr), address);
+	if (!pmd_k)
+		return -1;
+
+	if (pmd_large(*pmd_k))
+		return 0;
+
+	pte_k = pte_offset_kernel(pmd_k, address);
+	if (!pte_present(*pte_k))
+		return -1;
+
+	return 0;
+}
+NOKPROBE_SYMBOL(vmalloc_fault);
+
 void arch_sync_kernel_mappings(unsigned long start, unsigned long end)
 {
 	unsigned long addr;
@@ -1110,6 +1157,37 @@ do_kern_addr_fault(struct pt_regs *regs, unsigned long hw_error_code,
 	 */
 	WARN_ON_ONCE(hw_error_code & X86_PF_PK);
 
+#ifdef CONFIG_X86_32
+	/*
+	 * We can fault-in kernel-space virtual memory on-demand. The
+	 * 'reference' page table is init_mm.pgd.
+	 *
+	 * NOTE! We MUST NOT take any locks for this case. We may
+	 * be in an interrupt or a critical region, and should
+	 * only copy the information from the master page table,
+	 * nothing more.
+	 *
+	 * Before doing this on-demand faulting, ensure that the
+	 * fault is not any of the following:
+	 * 1. A fault on a PTE with a reserved bit set.
+	 * 2. A fault caused by a user-mode access.  (Do not demand-
+	 *    fault kernel memory due to user-mode accesses).
+	 * 3. A fault caused by a page-level protection violation.
+	 *    (A demand fault would be on a non-present page which
+	 *     would have X86_PF_PROT==0).
+	 *
+	 * This is only needed to close a race condition on x86-32 in
+	 * the vmalloc mapping/unmapping code. See the comment above
+	 * vmalloc_fault() for details. On x86-64 the race does not
+	 * exist as the vmalloc mappings don't need to be synchronized
+	 * there.
+	 */
+	if (!(hw_error_code & (X86_PF_RSVD | X86_PF_USER | X86_PF_PROT))) {
+		if (vmalloc_fault(address) >= 0)
+			return;
+	}
+#endif
+
 	/* Was the fault spurious, caused by lazy TLB invalidation? */
 	if (spurious_kernel_fault(hw_error_code, address))
 		return;

Powered by blists - more mailing lists