lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening PHC | |
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Date: Thu, 03 Sep 2020 15:28:32 +0530 From: Sai Prakash Ranjan <saiprakash.ranjan@...eaurora.org> To: Doug Anderson <dianders@...omium.org> Cc: Andy Gross <agross@...nel.org>, Bjorn Andersson <bjorn.andersson@...aro.org>, Stephen Boyd <swboyd@...omium.org>, linux-arm-msm <linux-arm-msm@...r.kernel.org>, LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, "Isaac J. Manjarres" <isaacm@...eaurora.org>, linux-arm-msm-owner@...r.kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCHv2] soc: qcom: llcc: Support chipsets that can write to llcc registers Hi, On 2020-08-18 21:07, Sai Prakash Ranjan wrote: > Hi Doug, > >> >> I guess to start, it wasn't obvious (to me) that there were two >> choices and we were picking one. Mentioning that the other >> alternative was way-based allocation would help a lot. Even if you >> can't fully explain the differences between the two, adding something >> to the commit message indicating that this is a policy decision (in >> other words, both work but each have their tradeoffs) would help. >> Something like this, if it's correct: >> >> In general we try to enable capacity based allocation (instead of the >> default way based allocation) since that gives us better performance >> with the current software / hardware configuration. >> > > Thanks, I will add it for next version. Let me also go poke some arch > teams > to understand if we actually do gain something with this selection, who > knows > we might get some additional details as well. > I got some information from arch team today, to quote them exactly: 1) What benefits capacity based allocation brings over the default way based allocation? "Capacity based allows finer grain partition. It is not about improved performance but more flexibility in configuration." 2) Retain through power collapse, doesn’t it burn more power? "This feature is similar to the standard feature of retention. Yes, when we have cache in retention mode it burns more power but it keeps the values so that when we wake up we can get more cache hits." If its good enough, then I will add this info to the commit msg and post next version. Thanks, Sai -- QUALCOMM INDIA, on behalf of Qualcomm Innovation Center, Inc. is a member of Code Aurora Forum, hosted by The Linux Foundation
Powered by blists - more mailing lists