[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <6dd97c08809d576136d474f4b3f3b045a03634bb.camel@yadro.com>
Date: Thu, 3 Sep 2020 13:19:28 +0300
From: Ivan Mikhaylov <i.mikhaylov@...ro.com>
To: Christophe Leroy <christophe.leroy@...roup.eu>
CC: Wim Van Sebroeck <wim@...ux-watchdog.org>,
Guenter Roeck <linux@...ck-us.net>,
<linux-watchdog@...r.kernel.org>, <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: watchdog start on restart
On Wed, 2020-09-02 at 15:19 +0200, Christophe Leroy wrote:
> Isn't it the default expected behaviour for a watchdog ?
It depends on hardware and system requirements. You may have not just one
watchdog device.
> "stop watchdog on restart" is there to keep things under control during
> a wanted machine reboot/restart, while still having the watchdog do its
> job on an unexpected restart.
Yes, that's correct.
> What would be the advantage of an ioctl() compared to the existing way ?
You can control stop/start at any moment for any number of watchdog devices.
Thanks.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists