lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CAHp75VfFZ2bgEqS7cbTfYzxtXk3T5VaoJpum5aiNMpfvhfbuqw@mail.gmail.com>
Date:   Thu, 3 Sep 2020 14:06:49 +0300
From:   Andy Shevchenko <andy.shevchenko@...il.com>
To:     Dmitry Osipenko <digetx@...il.com>
Cc:     Thierry Reding <thierry.reding@...il.com>,
        Jonathan Hunter <jonathanh@...dia.com>,
        Laxman Dewangan <ldewangan@...dia.com>,
        Wolfram Sang <wsa@...-dreams.de>,
        Michał Mirosław <mirq-linux@...e.qmqm.pl>,
        linux-i2c <linux-i2c@...r.kernel.org>,
        linux-tegra@...r.kernel.org,
        Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 03/22] i2c: tegra: Clean up messages in the code

On Thu, Sep 3, 2020 at 3:53 AM Dmitry Osipenko <digetx@...il.com> wrote:
>
> This patch unifies style of all messages in the driver by starting them
> with a lowercase letter and using consistent capitalization and wording
> for all messages.

I didn't look at the rest (yet) but this series has a patch ordering issue.
Why do we first do some little, non-critical clean ups?

The preferred way is to arrange like:
 - fixes that may be backported
 - fixes that are likely not going to be backported
 - features
 - cleanups

In its turn cleanups go by severity:
 - code affected ones (and maybe logical changers)
 - ...
 - commentary / indentation fixes

-- 
With Best Regards,
Andy Shevchenko

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ