| lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
|
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Date: Thu, 3 Sep 2020 18:07:00 +0530
From: Nishant Malpani <nish.malpani25@...il.com>
To: Jonathan Cameron <jic23@...nel.org>
Cc: Rob Herring <robh+dt@...nel.org>,
"Bogdan, Dragos" <dragos.bogdan@...log.com>,
Darius <darius.berghe@...log.com>,
Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
linux-iio <linux-iio@...r.kernel.org>,
devicetree <devicetree@...r.kernel.org>,
Nishant Malpani <nish.malpani25@...il.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/3] iio: gyro: adxrs290: Add triggered buffer support
Hello,
Thanks for the review, Jonathan. Comments inline...
On Sat, Aug 29, 2020 at 10:16 PM Jonathan Cameron <jic23@...nel.org> wrote:
>
> On Tue, 25 Aug 2020 18:17:09 +0530
> Nishant Malpani <nish.malpani25@...il.com> wrote:
>
> > Provide a way for continuous data capture by setting up buffer support. The
> > data ready signal exposed at the SYNC pin of the ADXRS290 is exploited as
> > a hardware interrupt which triggers to fill the buffer.
> >
> > Triggered buffer setup was tested with both hardware trigger (DATA_RDY) and
> > software triggers (sysfs-trig & hrtimer).
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Nishant Malpani <nish.malpani25@...il.com>
>
> I've tried not to overlap with Andy's comments but might have hit on a few.
> Anyhow, comments inline.
>
> Jonathan
>
>
> > ---
> > drivers/iio/gyro/Kconfig | 2 +
> > drivers/iio/gyro/adxrs290.c | 272 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++--
> > 2 files changed, 260 insertions(+), 14 deletions(-)
> >
> > diff --git a/drivers/iio/gyro/Kconfig b/drivers/iio/gyro/Kconfig
> > index 024a34139875..5824f2edf975 100644
> > --- a/drivers/iio/gyro/Kconfig
> > +++ b/drivers/iio/gyro/Kconfig
> > @@ -44,6 +44,8 @@ config ADIS16260
> > config ADXRS290
> > tristate "Analog Devices ADXRS290 Dual-Axis MEMS Gyroscope SPI driver"
> > depends on SPI
> > + select IIO_BUFFER
> > + select IIO_TRIGGERED_BUFFER
> > help
> > Say yes here to build support for Analog Devices ADXRS290 programmable
> > digital output gyroscope.
> > diff --git a/drivers/iio/gyro/adxrs290.c b/drivers/iio/gyro/adxrs290.c
> > index ff989536d2fb..25046590761e 100644
> > --- a/drivers/iio/gyro/adxrs290.c
> > +++ b/drivers/iio/gyro/adxrs290.c
> > @@ -13,8 +13,12 @@
> > #include <linux/module.h>
> > #include <linux/spi/spi.h>
> >
> > +#include <linux/iio/buffer.h>
> > #include <linux/iio/iio.h>
> > #include <linux/iio/sysfs.h>
> > +#include <linux/iio/trigger.h>
> > +#include <linux/iio/triggered_buffer.h>
> > +#include <linux/iio/trigger_consumer.h>
> >
> > #define ADXRS290_ADI_ID 0xAD
> > #define ADXRS290_MEMS_ID 0x1D
> > @@ -35,7 +39,9 @@
> > #define ADXRS290_READ BIT(7)
> > #define ADXRS290_TSM BIT(0)
> > #define ADXRS290_MEASUREMENT BIT(1)
> > -#define ADXRS290_SYNC GENMASK(1, 0)
> > +#define ADXRS290_DATA_RDY_OUT BIT(0)
> > +#define ADXRS290_SYNC_MASK GENMASK(1, 0)
> > +#define ADXRS290_SYNC(x) FIELD_PREP(ADXRS290_SYNC_MASK, x)
> > #define ADXRS290_LPF_MASK GENMASK(2, 0)
> > #define ADXRS290_LPF(x) FIELD_PREP(ADXRS290_LPF_MASK, x)
> > #define ADXRS290_HPF_MASK GENMASK(7, 4)
> > @@ -50,6 +56,13 @@ enum adxrs290_mode {
> > ADXRS290_MODE_MEASUREMENT,
> > };
> >
> > +enum adxrs290_scan_index {
> > + ADXRS290_IDX_X,
> > + ADXRS290_IDX_Y,
> > + ADXRS290_IDX_TEMP,
> > + ADXRS290_IDX_TS,
> > +};
> > +
> > struct adxrs290_state {
> > struct spi_device *spi;
> > /* Serialize reads and their subsequent processing */
> > @@ -57,6 +70,12 @@ struct adxrs290_state {
> > enum adxrs290_mode mode;
> > unsigned int lpf_3db_freq_idx;
> > unsigned int hpf_3db_freq_idx;
> > + struct iio_trigger *dready_trig;
> > + /* Ensure correct alignment of timestamp when present */
> > + struct {
> > + s16 channels[3];
> > + s64 ts __aligned(8);
> > + } buffer;
> } buffer;
>
> I can see why you did the alignment like you have, but it looks really odd
> in this case.
>
I thought so too. Will fix it in v2.
> > };
> >
>
> ...
>
> >
> > +static void adxrs290_chip_off_action(void *data)
> > +{
> > + struct iio_dev *indio_dev = data;
> > +
> > + adxrs290_set_mode(indio_dev, ADXRS290_MODE_STANDBY);
> > +}
> > +
> > static int adxrs290_read_raw(struct iio_dev *indio_dev,
> > struct iio_chan_spec const *chan,
> > int *val,
> > @@ -215,24 +287,34 @@ static int adxrs290_read_raw(struct iio_dev *indio_dev,
> >
> > switch (mask) {
> > case IIO_CHAN_INFO_RAW:
> > + ret = iio_device_claim_direct_mode(indio_dev);
> > + if (ret)
> > + return ret;
> > +
> > switch (chan->type) {
> > case IIO_ANGL_VEL:
> > ret = adxrs290_get_rate_data(indio_dev,
> > ADXRS290_READ_REG(chan->address),
> > val);
> > if (ret < 0)
> > - return ret;
> > + goto err_release;
> >
> > - return IIO_VAL_INT;
> > + ret = IIO_VAL_INT;
> > + break;
> > case IIO_TEMP:
> > ret = adxrs290_get_temp_data(indio_dev, val);
> > if (ret < 0)
> > - return ret;
> > + goto err_release;
> >
> > - return IIO_VAL_INT;
> > + ret = IIO_VAL_INT;
> > + break;
> > default:
> > - return -EINVAL;
> > + ret = -EINVAL;
> > + break;
> > }
> > +err_release:
> > + iio_device_release_direct_mode(indio_dev);
> > + return ret;
> > case IIO_CHAN_INFO_SCALE:
> > switch (chan->type) {
> > case IIO_ANGL_VEL:
> > @@ -279,34 +361,53 @@ static int adxrs290_write_raw(struct iio_dev *indio_dev,
> > long mask)
> > {
> > struct adxrs290_state *st = iio_priv(indio_dev);
> > - int lpf_idx, hpf_idx;
> > + int ret, lpf_idx, hpf_idx;
> > +
> > + ret = iio_device_claim_direct_mode(indio_dev);
>
> Is there anything in the datasheet that says we can't change the filters
> whilst doing captures? Might get crazy data but if the datasheet doesn't
> want against a particular action, then we tend not to try and prevent it.
>
The datasheet, to my knowledge, explicitly doesn't mention any
restriction on changing the filter settings during a capture.
Quoting the datasheet, "The group delay of the wideband filter option
is less than 0.5ms" (pg. 11) - during an ongoing capture if one
re-configures the filter, how do we address this?
> > + if (ret)
> > + return ret;
> >
> > switch (mask) {
> > case IIO_CHAN_INFO_LOW_PASS_FILTER_3DB_FREQUENCY:
> > lpf_idx = adxrs290_find_match(adxrs290_lpf_3db_freq_hz_table,
> > ARRAY_SIZE(adxrs290_lpf_3db_freq_hz_table),
> > val, val2);
> > - if (lpf_idx < 0)
> > - return -EINVAL;
> > + if (lpf_idx < 0) {
> > + ret = -EINVAL;
> > + goto err_release;
> > + }
> > +
> > /* caching the updated state of the low-pass filter */
> > st->lpf_3db_freq_idx = lpf_idx;
> > /* retrieving the current state of the high-pass filter */
> > hpf_idx = st->hpf_3db_freq_idx;
> > - return adxrs290_set_filter_freq(indio_dev, lpf_idx, hpf_idx);
> > + ret = adxrs290_set_filter_freq(indio_dev, lpf_idx, hpf_idx);
> > + break;
> > +
> > case IIO_CHAN_INFO_HIGH_PASS_FILTER_3DB_FREQUENCY:
> > hpf_idx = adxrs290_find_match(adxrs290_hpf_3db_freq_hz_table,
> > ARRAY_SIZE(adxrs290_hpf_3db_freq_hz_table),
> > val, val2);
> > - if (hpf_idx < 0)
> > - return -EINVAL;
> > + if (hpf_idx < 0) {
> > + ret = -EINVAL;
> > + goto err_release;
> > + }
> > +
> > /* caching the updated state of the high-pass filter */
> > st->hpf_3db_freq_idx = hpf_idx;
> > /* retrieving the current state of the low-pass filter */
> > lpf_idx = st->lpf_3db_freq_idx;
> > - return adxrs290_set_filter_freq(indio_dev, lpf_idx, hpf_idx);
> > + ret = adxrs290_set_filter_freq(indio_dev, lpf_idx, hpf_idx);
> > + break;
> > +
> > + default:
> > + ret = -EINVAL;
> > + break;
> > }
> >
> > - return -EINVAL;
> > +err_release:
> I think Andy may have mentioned this, but a break would work just as well
> to get you here
>
Agreed. Will refactor accordingly in v2.
> > + iio_device_release_direct_mode(indio_dev);
> > + return ret;
> > }
> >
> > static int adxrs290_read_avail(struct iio_dev *indio_dev,
> > @@ -334,6 +435,68 @@ static int adxrs290_read_avail(struct iio_dev *indio_dev,
> > }
> > }
> >
> > +static int adxrs290_data_rdy_trigger_set_state(struct iio_trigger *trig, bool state)
> > +{
> > + struct iio_dev *indio_dev = iio_trigger_get_drvdata(trig);
> > + struct adxrs290_state *st = iio_priv(indio_dev);
> > + int ret;
> > + u8 val;
> > +
> > + val = (state ? ADXRS290_SYNC(ADXRS290_DATA_RDY_OUT) : 0);
>
> Why the outer set of brackets?
>
I now realize those are unnecessary and probably violate the kernel
coding-style. Will remove those in v2.
> > +
> > + ret = adxrs290_spi_write_reg(st->spi, ADXRS290_REG_DATA_RDY, val);
> > + if (ret < 0)
> > + dev_err(&st->spi->dev, "failed to start data ready interrupt\n");
> > +
> > + return ret;
> > +}
> > +
> > +static int adxrs290_reset_trig(struct iio_trigger *trig)
> > +{
> > + struct iio_dev *indio_dev = iio_trigger_get_drvdata(trig);
> > + int val;
> > +
> > + /*
> > + * Data ready interrupt is reset after a read of the data registers.
> > + * Here, we only read the 16b DATAY registers as that marks the end of
> > + * a read of the data registers and initiates a reset for the interrupt line.
> > + */
> > + return adxrs290_get_rate_data(indio_dev, ADXRS290_READ_REG(ADXRS290_REG_DATAY0), &val);
>
> We have a bug around this at the moment btw.
>
> A try_reenable callback shouldn't return an error. The return value is
> meant to indicate that we need to go round again or not
> (though that's broken currently anwyay). Hence safer to just not
> return errors.
>
> return 0;
>
Right, I forgot about the recent conversations on the mailing list
about this; thanks for pointing out again. Will fix this in v2.
> > +}
> > +
> > +static const struct iio_trigger_ops adxrs290_trigger_ops = {
> > + .set_trigger_state = &adxrs290_data_rdy_trigger_set_state,
> > + .validate_device = &iio_trigger_validate_own_device,
> > + .try_reenable = &adxrs290_reset_trig,
> > +};
> > +
> > +static irqreturn_t adxrs290_trigger_handler(int irq, void *p)
> > +{
> > + struct iio_poll_func *pf = p;
> > + struct iio_dev *indio_dev = pf->indio_dev;
> > + struct adxrs290_state *st = iio_priv(indio_dev);
> > + struct spi_device *spi = st->spi;
>
> As you only use spi once, I'd just use st->spi inline.
>
Okay.
> > + u8 tx = ADXRS290_READ_REG(ADXRS290_REG_DATAX0);
> > + int ret;
> > +
> > + mutex_lock(&st->lock);
> > +
> > + /* exercise a bulk data capture starting from reg DATAX0... */
> > + ret = spi_write_then_read(spi, &tx, sizeof(tx), st->buffer.channels,
> > + sizeof(st->buffer.channels));
> > + if (ret < 0)
> > + goto done;
> > +
> > + iio_push_to_buffers_with_timestamp(indio_dev, &st->buffer,
> > + pf->timestamp);
> > +
> > +done:
> > + mutex_unlock(&st->lock);
> > + iio_trigger_notify_done(indio_dev->trig);
> > +
> > + return IRQ_HANDLED;
> > +}
> > +
> > #define ADXRS290_ANGL_VEL_CHANNEL(reg, axis) { \
> > .type = IIO_ANGL_VEL, \
> > .address = reg, \
> > @@ -346,6 +509,13 @@ static int adxrs290_read_avail(struct iio_dev *indio_dev,
> > .info_mask_shared_by_type_available = \
> > BIT(IIO_CHAN_INFO_LOW_PASS_FILTER_3DB_FREQUENCY) | \
> > BIT(IIO_CHAN_INFO_HIGH_PASS_FILTER_3DB_FREQUENCY), \
> > + .scan_index = ADXRS290_IDX_##axis, \
> > + .scan_type = { \
> > + .sign = 's', \
> > + .realbits = 16, \
> > + .storagebits = 16, \
> > + .endianness = IIO_LE, \
> > + }, \
> > }
> >
> > static const struct iio_chan_spec adxrs290_channels[] = {
> > @@ -356,7 +526,21 @@ static const struct iio_chan_spec adxrs290_channels[] = {
> > .address = ADXRS290_REG_TEMP0,
> > .info_mask_separate = BIT(IIO_CHAN_INFO_RAW) |
> > BIT(IIO_CHAN_INFO_SCALE),
> > + .scan_index = ADXRS290_IDX_TEMP,
> > + .scan_type = {
> > + .sign = 's',
> > + .realbits = 12,
> > + .storagebits = 16,
> > + .shift = 0,
>
> No need to specify shift if it is 0 as that's the obvious default.
>
Got it.
> > + .endianness = IIO_LE,
> > + },
> > },
> > + IIO_CHAN_SOFT_TIMESTAMP(ADXRS290_IDX_TS),
> > +};
> > +
> > +static const unsigned long adxrs290_avail_scan_masks[] = {
> > + BIT(ADXRS290_IDX_X) | BIT(ADXRS290_IDX_Y) | BIT(ADXRS290_IDX_TEMP),
> > + 0
> > };
> >
> > static const struct iio_info adxrs290_info = {
> > @@ -365,6 +549,47 @@ static const struct iio_info adxrs290_info = {
> > .read_avail = &adxrs290_read_avail,
> > };
> >
> > +static int adxrs290_probe_trigger(struct iio_dev *indio_dev)
> > +{
> > + struct adxrs290_state *st = iio_priv(indio_dev);
> > + int ret;
> > +
> > + if (!st->spi->irq) {
> > + dev_info(&st->spi->dev, "no irq, using polling\n");
> > + return 0;
> > + }
> > +
> > + st->dready_trig = devm_iio_trigger_alloc(&st->spi->dev,
> > + "%s-dev%d",
> > + indio_dev->name,
> > + indio_dev->id);
>
> As below, this could be sensibly done on fewer lines without any real loss
> of readability (staying under advised 80 chars)
>
Sure, will re-align in v2.
> > + if (!st->dready_trig)
> > + return -ENOMEM;
> > +
> > + st->dready_trig->dev.parent = &st->spi->dev;
> > + st->dready_trig->ops = &adxrs290_trigger_ops;
> > + iio_trigger_set_drvdata(st->dready_trig, indio_dev);
> > +
> > + ret = devm_request_irq(&st->spi->dev, st->spi->irq,
> > + &iio_trigger_generic_data_rdy_poll,
> > + IRQF_ONESHOT,
> > + "adxrs290_irq", st->dready_trig);
> > + if (ret < 0) {
> > + dev_err(&st->spi->dev, "request irq %d failed\n", st->spi->irq);
> > + return ret;
> > + }
> > +
> > + ret = devm_iio_trigger_register(&st->spi->dev, st->dready_trig);
> > + if (ret) {
> > + dev_err(&st->spi->dev, "iio trigger register failed\n");
> > + return ret;
> > + }
> > +
> > + indio_dev->trig = iio_trigger_get(st->dready_trig);
> > +
> > + return 0;
> > +}
> > +
> > static int adxrs290_probe(struct spi_device *spi)
> > {
> > struct iio_dev *indio_dev;
> > @@ -384,6 +609,7 @@ static int adxrs290_probe(struct spi_device *spi)
> > indio_dev->channels = adxrs290_channels;
> > indio_dev->num_channels = ARRAY_SIZE(adxrs290_channels);
> > indio_dev->info = &adxrs290_info;
> > + indio_dev->available_scan_masks = adxrs290_avail_scan_masks;
> >
> > mutex_init(&st->lock);
> >
> > @@ -416,6 +642,12 @@ static int adxrs290_probe(struct spi_device *spi)
> > /* max transition time to measurement mode */
> > msleep(ADXRS290_MAX_TRANSITION_TIME_MS);
> >
> > + ret = devm_add_action_or_reset(&spi->dev,
> > + adxrs290_chip_off_action,
> > + indio_dev);
>
> What is this unwinding? We should only be using devm to undo things
> that have been 'done' in probe and the association should be clear.
>
This unwinding is for placing the device **back** to its default
'STANDBY' mode. The device, during the probe, was put to 'MEASUREMENT'
mode during 'adxrs290_initial_setup()' a few lines back.
How else do you suggest I highlight the association?
> You have been a bit in consistent with wrapping. Personally I would
> go for as many parameters as fit on each line under 80 chars as possible.
> The only exception being when there is some clear 'pairing' of parameters
> or similar.
>
Yes, I realize that, sorry. Will fix wherever necessary in v2.
With regards,
Nishant Malpani
> > + if (ret < 0)
> > + return ret;
> > +
> > ret = adxrs290_get_3db_freq(indio_dev, &val, &val2);
> > if (ret < 0)
> > return ret;
> > @@ -423,6 +655,18 @@ static int adxrs290_probe(struct spi_device *spi)
> > st->lpf_3db_freq_idx = val;
> > st->hpf_3db_freq_idx = val2;
> >
> > + ret = devm_iio_triggered_buffer_setup(&spi->dev, indio_dev,
> > + &iio_pollfunc_store_time,
> > + &adxrs290_trigger_handler, NULL);
> > + if (ret < 0) {
> > + dev_err(&spi->dev, "iio triggered buffer setup failed\n");
> > + return ret;
> > + }
> > +
> > + ret = adxrs290_probe_trigger(indio_dev);
> > + if (ret < 0)
> > + return ret;
> > +
> > return devm_iio_device_register(&spi->dev, indio_dev);
> > }
> >
>
Powered by blists - more mailing lists