lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Date: Thu, 3 Sep 2020 10:47:34 -0300 From: Fabio Estevam <festevam@...il.com> To: Matthias Schiffer <matthias.schiffer@...tq-group.com> Cc: Mark Brown <broonie@...nel.org>, Rob Herring <robh+dt@...nel.org>, Shawn Guo <shawnguo@...nel.org>, Sascha Hauer <s.hauer@...gutronix.de>, NXP Linux Team <linux-imx@....com>, linux-spi <linux-spi@...r.kernel.org>, "open list:OPEN FIRMWARE AND FLATTENED DEVICE TREE BINDINGS" <devicetree@...r.kernel.org>, linux-kernel <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org> Subject: Re: spi-imx: correct interpretation of num-cs DT property? Hi Matthias, On Thu, Sep 3, 2020 at 10:40 AM Matthias Schiffer <matthias.schiffer@...tq-group.com> wrote: > As currently no in-tree DTs use the num-cs property for spi-imx and > it's not documented, should support for it be dropped from the driver > altogether? Yes, it makes sense to drop num-cs support from the spi-imx driver. Care to send a patch? Thanks
Powered by blists - more mailing lists