[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CAOMZO5DDhSJHj_PN4ckzYedV3mvNC1=+RvNT6TM2s-rE5iHxcQ@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 3 Sep 2020 10:47:34 -0300
From: Fabio Estevam <festevam@...il.com>
To: Matthias Schiffer <matthias.schiffer@...tq-group.com>
Cc: Mark Brown <broonie@...nel.org>, Rob Herring <robh+dt@...nel.org>,
Shawn Guo <shawnguo@...nel.org>,
Sascha Hauer <s.hauer@...gutronix.de>,
NXP Linux Team <linux-imx@....com>,
linux-spi <linux-spi@...r.kernel.org>,
"open list:OPEN FIRMWARE AND FLATTENED DEVICE TREE BINDINGS"
<devicetree@...r.kernel.org>,
linux-kernel <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: spi-imx: correct interpretation of num-cs DT property?
Hi Matthias,
On Thu, Sep 3, 2020 at 10:40 AM Matthias Schiffer
<matthias.schiffer@...tq-group.com> wrote:
> As currently no in-tree DTs use the num-cs property for spi-imx and
> it's not documented, should support for it be dropped from the driver
> altogether?
Yes, it makes sense to drop num-cs support from the spi-imx driver.
Care to send a patch?
Thanks
Powered by blists - more mailing lists