linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v4 04/10] vfio/fsl-mc: Implement VFIO_DEVICE_GET_REGION

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <d17469ad-9041-9b1c-64e4-f406888262b7@redhat.com>
Date:   Thu, 3 Sep 2020 17:16:40 +0200
From:   Auger Eric <eric.auger@...hat.com>
To:     Diana Craciun <diana.craciun@....nxp.com>,
        alex.williamson@...hat.com, kvm@...r.kernel.org
Cc:     linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, bharatb.linux@...il.com,
        laurentiu.tudor@....com, Bharat Bhushan <Bharat.Bhushan@....com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 04/10] vfio/fsl-mc: Implement
 VFIO_DEVICE_GET_REGION_INFO ioctl call

Hi Diana,

On 8/26/20 11:33 AM, Diana Craciun wrote:
> Expose to userspace information about the memory regions.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Bharat Bhushan <Bharat.Bhushan@....com>
> Signed-off-by: Diana Craciun <diana.craciun@....nxp.com>
> ---
>  drivers/vfio/fsl-mc/vfio_fsl_mc.c         | 79 ++++++++++++++++++++++-
>  drivers/vfio/fsl-mc/vfio_fsl_mc_private.h | 19 ++++++
>  2 files changed, 97 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/vfio/fsl-mc/vfio_fsl_mc.c b/drivers/vfio/fsl-mc/vfio_fsl_mc.c
> index 5a5460d01f00..093b8d68496c 100644
> --- a/drivers/vfio/fsl-mc/vfio_fsl_mc.c
> +++ b/drivers/vfio/fsl-mc/vfio_fsl_mc.c
> @@ -17,16 +17,72 @@
>  
>  static struct fsl_mc_driver vfio_fsl_mc_driver;
>  
> +static int vfio_fsl_mc_regions_init(struct vfio_fsl_mc_device *vdev)
> +{
> +	struct fsl_mc_device *mc_dev = vdev->mc_dev;
> +	int count = mc_dev->obj_desc.region_count;
> +	int i;
> +
> +	vdev->regions = kcalloc(count, sizeof(struct vfio_fsl_mc_region),
> +				GFP_KERNEL);
> +	if (!vdev->regions)
> +		return -ENOMEM;
> +
> +	for (i = 0; i < count; i++) {
> +		struct resource *res = &mc_dev->regions[i];
> +
> +		vdev->regions[i].addr = res->start;
> +		vdev->regions[i].size = resource_size(res);
> +		vdev->regions[i].flags = 0;
why 0? I see in
> +	}
> +
> +	vdev->num_regions = mc_dev->obj_desc.region_count;
nit: you can use count directly fsl-mc-bus.c that flags can take
meaningful values
> +	return 0;
> +}
> +
> +static void vfio_fsl_mc_regions_cleanup(struct vfio_fsl_mc_device *vdev)
> +{
> +	vdev->num_regions = 0;
> +	kfree(vdev->regions);
> +}
> +
>  static int vfio_fsl_mc_open(void *device_data)
>  {
> +	struct vfio_fsl_mc_device *vdev = device_data;
> +	int ret;
> +
>  	if (!try_module_get(THIS_MODULE))
>  		return -ENODEV;
>  
> +	mutex_lock(&vdev->driver_lock);
> +	if (!vdev->refcnt) {
> +		ret = vfio_fsl_mc_regions_init(vdev);
> +		if (ret)
> +			goto err_reg_init;
> +	}
> +	vdev->refcnt++;
> +
> +	mutex_unlock(&vdev->driver_lock);
> +
>  	return 0;
> +
> +err_reg_init:
> +	mutex_unlock(&vdev->driver_lock);
> +	module_put(THIS_MODULE);
> +	return ret;
>  }
>  
>  static void vfio_fsl_mc_release(void *device_data)
>  {
> +	struct vfio_fsl_mc_device *vdev = device_data;
> +
> +	mutex_lock(&vdev->driver_lock);
> +
> +	if (!(--vdev->refcnt))
> +		vfio_fsl_mc_regions_cleanup(vdev);
> +
> +	mutex_unlock(&vdev->driver_lock);
> +
>  	module_put(THIS_MODULE);
>  }
>  
> @@ -59,7 +115,25 @@ static long vfio_fsl_mc_ioctl(void *device_data, unsigned int cmd,
>  	}
>  	case VFIO_DEVICE_GET_REGION_INFO:
>  	{
> -		return -ENOTTY;
> +		struct vfio_region_info info;
> +
> +		minsz = offsetofend(struct vfio_region_info, offset);
> +
> +		if (copy_from_user(&info, (void __user *)arg, minsz))
> +			return -EFAULT;
> +
> +		if (info.argsz < minsz)
> +			return -EINVAL;
> +
> +		if (info.index >= vdev->num_regions)
> +			return -EINVAL;
> +
> +		/* map offset to the physical address  */
> +		info.offset = VFIO_FSL_MC_INDEX_TO_OFFSET(info.index);
> +		info.size = vdev->regions[info.index].size;
> +		info.flags = vdev->regions[info.index].flags;
> +
> +		return copy_to_user((void __user *)arg, &info, minsz);
>  	}
>  	case VFIO_DEVICE_GET_IRQ_INFO:
>  	{
> @@ -204,6 +278,7 @@ static int vfio_fsl_mc_probe(struct fsl_mc_device *mc_dev)
>  		vfio_iommu_group_put(group, dev);
>  		return ret;
>  	}
> +	mutex_init(&vdev->driver_lock);
>  
>  	return ret;
>  }
> @@ -227,6 +302,8 @@ static int vfio_fsl_mc_remove(struct fsl_mc_device *mc_dev)
>  
>  	mc_dev->mc_io = NULL;
>  
> +	mutex_destroy(&vdev->driver_lock);
> +
>  	vfio_iommu_group_put(mc_dev->dev.iommu_group, dev);
>  
>  	return 0;
> diff --git a/drivers/vfio/fsl-mc/vfio_fsl_mc_private.h b/drivers/vfio/fsl-mc/vfio_fsl_mc_private.h
> index 37d61eaa58c8..818dfd3df4db 100644
> --- a/drivers/vfio/fsl-mc/vfio_fsl_mc_private.h
> +++ b/drivers/vfio/fsl-mc/vfio_fsl_mc_private.h
> @@ -7,9 +7,28 @@
>  #ifndef VFIO_FSL_MC_PRIVATE_H
>  #define VFIO_FSL_MC_PRIVATE_H
>  
> +#define VFIO_FSL_MC_OFFSET_SHIFT    40
> +#define VFIO_FSL_MC_OFFSET_MASK (((u64)(1) << VFIO_FSL_MC_OFFSET_SHIFT) - 1)
> +
> +#define VFIO_FSL_MC_OFFSET_TO_INDEX(off) ((off) >> VFIO_FSL_MC_OFFSET_SHIFT)
> +
> +#define VFIO_FSL_MC_INDEX_TO_OFFSET(index)	\
> +	((u64)(index) << VFIO_FSL_MC_OFFSET_SHIFT)
> +
> +struct vfio_fsl_mc_region {
> +	u32			flags;
> +	u32			type;
> +	u64			addr;
> +	resource_size_t		size;
> +};
> +
>  struct vfio_fsl_mc_device {
>  	struct fsl_mc_device		*mc_dev;
>  	struct notifier_block        nb;
> +	int				refcnt;
> +	u32				num_regions;
> +	struct vfio_fsl_mc_region	*regions;
> +	struct mutex driver_lock;
>  };
>  
>  #endif /* VFIO_FSL_MC_PRIVATE_H */
> 
Otherwise looks good to me

Thanks

Eric