linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 00/13] x86/debug: Untangle handle

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Thu, 3 Sep 2020 16:21:20 +0100
From:   Daniel Thompson <daniel.thompson@...aro.org>
To:     Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>
Cc:     x86@...nel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
        Kyle Huey <me@...ehuey.com>,
        Alexandre Chartre <alexandre.chartre@...cle.com>,
        Robert O'Callahan <rocallahan@...il.com>,
        "Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@...nel.org>,
        Frederic Weisbecker <frederic@...nel.org>,
        Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@...hat.com>,
        Sean Christopherson <sean.j.christopherson@...el.com>,
        Masami Hiramatsu <mhiramat@...nel.org>,
        Petr Mladek <pmladek@...e.com>,
        Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org>,
        Joel Fernandes <joel@...lfernandes.org>,
        Boris Ostrovsky <boris.ostrovsky@...cle.com>,
        Juergen Gross <jgross@...e.com>,
        Brian Gerst <brgerst@...il.com>,
        Andy Lutomirski <luto@...nel.org>,
        Josh Poimboeuf <jpoimboe@...hat.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 00/13] x86/debug: Untangle handle_debug()

On Wed, Sep 02, 2020 at 03:25:49PM +0200, Peter Zijlstra wrote:
> Hi,
> 
> The first two patches probably ought to go in x86/urgent, the rest (!RFC) can
> go into x86/core and wait a bit.
> 
> handle_debug() is a mess, and now that we have separate user and kernel paths,
> try and clean it up a bit.
> 
> There's two RFC patches at the end that impact the ptrace_{get,set}_debugreg(6)
> ABI, I've no idea what, if anything, is expected of that or if anybody actually
> cares about that. If I read the code correctly nothing actually consumes the
> value from ptrace_set_debugreg(6).

I applied this both with and without the RFC patches and pointed the
(still work-in-progress) kgdb test suite at it. I won't pretend the
suite is comprehensive but nevertheless FWIW:
Tested-by: Daniel Thompson <daniel.thompson@...aro.org>


Daniel.


> 
> Kyle, you seem to be pushing all this to the edge with RR, any clues?
> 
> Since v2:
> 
>  - fixed (user) INT1 / icebp detection
>  - some further cleanups
>  - two additional RFC patches
>