linux-kernel - Re: [RFC v4 1/1] selftests/cpuidle: Add support for cpuidle latency measurement

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <515651b2caa08799df03f07dcc429321b4dcc05e.camel@gmail.com>
Date:   Thu, 03 Sep 2020 19:13:15 +0300
From:   Artem Bityutskiy <dedekind1@...il.com>
To:     Pratik Sampat <psampat@...ux.ibm.com>, rjw@...ysocki.net,
        daniel.lezcano@...aro.org, srivatsa@...il.mit.edu,
        shuah@...nel.org, npiggin@...il.com, ego@...ux.vnet.ibm.com,
        svaidy@...ux.ibm.com, linux-pm@...r.kernel.org,
        linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-kselftest@...r.kernel.org,
        pratik.r.sampat@...il.com
Subject: Re: [RFC v4 1/1] selftests/cpuidle: Add support for cpuidle latency
 measurement

On Thu, 2020-09-03 at 17:50 +0300, Artem Bityutskiy wrote:
> Well, things depend on platform, it is really "void", it is just
> different and it measures an optimized case. The result may be smaller
> observed latency.

Sorry, I meant to say it is _not_ really "void".