[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CALCETrUq3xiHV2xOZV-FD_de_P_TL-Bs91XT+F+79psBfigCSg@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 3 Sep 2020 09:15:25 -0700
From: Andy Lutomirski <luto@...nel.org>
To: Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@...el.com>
Cc: "Yu, Yu-cheng" <yu-cheng.yu@...el.com>,
Jann Horn <jannh@...gle.com>,
"the arch/x86 maintainers" <x86@...nel.org>,
"H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>,
kernel list <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
"open list:DOCUMENTATION" <linux-doc@...r.kernel.org>,
Linux-MM <linux-mm@...ck.org>,
linux-arch <linux-arch@...r.kernel.org>,
Linux API <linux-api@...r.kernel.org>,
Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>,
Andy Lutomirski <luto@...nel.org>,
Balbir Singh <bsingharora@...il.com>,
Borislav Petkov <bp@...en8.de>,
Cyrill Gorcunov <gorcunov@...il.com>,
Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@...ux.intel.com>,
Eugene Syromiatnikov <esyr@...hat.com>,
Florian Weimer <fweimer@...hat.com>,
"H.J. Lu" <hjl.tools@...il.com>, Jonathan Corbet <corbet@....net>,
Kees Cook <keescook@...omium.org>,
Mike Kravetz <mike.kravetz@...cle.com>,
Nadav Amit <nadav.amit@...il.com>,
Oleg Nesterov <oleg@...hat.com>, Pavel Machek <pavel@....cz>,
Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>,
Randy Dunlap <rdunlap@...radead.org>,
"Ravi V. Shankar" <ravi.v.shankar@...el.com>,
Vedvyas Shanbhogue <vedvyas.shanbhogue@...el.com>,
Dave Martin <Dave.Martin@....com>,
Weijiang Yang <weijiang.yang@...el.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v11 6/9] x86/cet: Add PTRACE interface for CET
On Thu, Sep 3, 2020 at 9:12 AM Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@...el.com> wrote:
>
> On 9/3/20 9:09 AM, Yu, Yu-cheng wrote:
> > If the debugger is going to write an MSR, only in the third case would
> > this make a slight sense. For example, if the system has CET enabled,
> > but the task does not have CET enabled, and GDB is writing to a CET MSR.
> > But still, this is strange to me.
>
> If this is strange, then why do we even _implement_ writes?
Well, if gdb wants to force a tracee to return early from a function,
wouldn't it want the ability to modify SSP?
--Andy
Powered by blists - more mailing lists