[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20200903164709.GA7406@qmqm.qmqm.pl>
Date: Thu, 3 Sep 2020 18:47:09 +0200
From: Michał Mirosław <mirq-linux@...e.qmqm.pl>
To: Dmitry Osipenko <digetx@...il.com>
Cc: Thierry Reding <thierry.reding@...il.com>,
Jonathan Hunter <jonathanh@...dia.com>,
Laxman Dewangan <ldewangan@...dia.com>,
Wolfram Sang <wsa@...-dreams.de>, linux-i2c@...r.kernel.org,
linux-tegra@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v1 00/12] Improvements for Tegra I2C driver
On Thu, Sep 03, 2020 at 04:12:13AM +0300, Dmitry Osipenko wrote:
> 03.09.2020 00:20, Michał Mirosław пишет:
> > BTW, I wonder if you could expose i2c_in_atomic_xfer_mode() and use it
> > to differentiate atomic_xfer from normal and get rid of the internal
> > flag and .master_xfer_atomic callback.
>
> The atomic transfer uses 90% of the code path that a non-atomic transfer
> uses. I don't see how it could be exposed without duplicated lots of the
> code, unless I'm not missing what you're suggesting.
The I2C core falls back to .master_xfer even in atomic mode if
.master_xfer_atomic is NULL, so what I'm suggesting is to make
i2c_in_atomic_xfer_mode() public (from i2c-core.h) and use it in
normal .master_xfer to choose atomic wait variants.
Best Regards,
Michał Mirosław
Powered by blists - more mailing lists