lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20200903164709.GA7406@qmqm.qmqm.pl>
Date:   Thu, 3 Sep 2020 18:47:09 +0200
From:   Michał Mirosław <mirq-linux@...e.qmqm.pl>
To:     Dmitry Osipenko <digetx@...il.com>
Cc:     Thierry Reding <thierry.reding@...il.com>,
        Jonathan Hunter <jonathanh@...dia.com>,
        Laxman Dewangan <ldewangan@...dia.com>,
        Wolfram Sang <wsa@...-dreams.de>, linux-i2c@...r.kernel.org,
        linux-tegra@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v1 00/12] Improvements for Tegra I2C driver

On Thu, Sep 03, 2020 at 04:12:13AM +0300, Dmitry Osipenko wrote:
> 03.09.2020 00:20, Michał Mirosław пишет:
> > BTW, I wonder if you could expose i2c_in_atomic_xfer_mode() and use it
> > to differentiate atomic_xfer from normal and get rid of the internal
> > flag and .master_xfer_atomic callback.
> 
> The atomic transfer uses 90% of the code path that a non-atomic transfer
> uses. I don't see how it could be exposed without duplicated lots of the
> code, unless I'm not missing what you're suggesting.

The I2C core falls back to .master_xfer even in atomic mode if
.master_xfer_atomic is NULL, so what I'm suggesting is to make
i2c_in_atomic_xfer_mode() public (from i2c-core.h) and use it in
normal .master_xfer to choose atomic wait variants.

Best Regards,
Michał Mirosław

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ