[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CAHk-=wgmhDNm7+w0atqAj3X=izWxNut_4kQGTG8n=+HhtxEbRw@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 4 Sep 2020 10:11:06 -0700
From: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>
To: Mikulas Patocka <mpatocka@...hat.com>
Cc: Peter Xu <peterx@...hat.com>, Jann Horn <jannh@...gle.com>,
Christoph Hellwig <hch@....de>,
Oleg Nesterov <oleg@...hat.com>,
Kirill Shutemov <kirill@...temov.name>,
Jan Kara <jack@...e.cz>,
Andrea Arcangeli <aarcange@...hat.com>,
Matthew Wilcox <willy@...radead.org>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
Dan Williams <dan.j.williams@...el.com>,
Linux-MM <linux-mm@...ck.org>,
Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
linux-nvdimm <linux-nvdimm@...ts.01.org>
Subject: Re: a crash when running strace from persistent memory
On Fri, Sep 4, 2020 at 1:08 AM Mikulas Patocka <mpatocka@...hat.com> wrote:
>
> I applied these four patches and strace works well. There is no longer any
> warning or crash.
Ok. I obviously approve of that series whole-heartedly, but I still
didn't want to apply it this way (and with this kind of "mid-rc"
timing).
I was hoping to just leave it for the next merge window, but there are
now two independent problems that that forced COW patch of mine
caused, and a plain revert isn't acceptable either, so I've just
applied that series to my tree despite the garbage timing.
Maybe I'm just making excuses and rationalizing because I wanted that
series anyway, and patches that remove lines in core code make me
happy, but I don't see other great alternatives.
Linus
Powered by blists - more mailing lists