[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <fd2a33fc-2383-66cb-0fd7-d5aa0cc9111f@roeck-us.net>
Date: Fri, 4 Sep 2020 12:41:45 -0700
From: Guenter Roeck <linux@...ck-us.net>
To: ChiYuan Huang <u0084500@...il.com>
Cc: Heikki Krogerus <heikki.krogerus@...ux.intel.com>,
Greg KH <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
linux-usb@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
cy_huang <cy_huang@...htek.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] usb: typec: tcpm: Fix if vbus before cc, hard_reset_count
not reset issue
On 9/3/20 9:21 AM, ChiYuan Huang wrote:
> Guenter Roeck <linux@...ck-us.net> 於 2020年9月3日 週四 上午12:57寫道:
>>
>> On Wed, Sep 02, 2020 at 11:35:33PM +0800, cy_huang wrote:
>>> From: ChiYuan Huang <cy_huang@...htek.com>
>>>
>>> Fix: If vbus event is before cc_event trigger, hard_reset_count
>>> won't bt reset for some case.
>>>
>>> Signed-off-by: ChiYuan Huang <cy_huang@...htek.com>
>>> ---
>>> Below's the flow.
>>>
>>> _tcpm_pd_vbus_off() -> run_state_machine to change state to SNK_UNATTACHED
>>> call tcpm_snk_detach() -> tcpm_snk_detach() -> tcpm_detach()
>>> tcpm_port_is_disconnected() will be called.
>>> But port->attached is still true and port->cc1=open and port->cc2=open
>>>
>>> It cause tcpm_port_is_disconnected return false, then hard_reset_count won't be reset.
>>> After that, tcpm_reset_port() is called.
>>> port->attached become false.
>>>
>>> After that, cc now trigger cc_change event, the hard_reset_count will be kept.
>>> Even tcpm_detach will be called, due to port->attached is false, tcpm_detach()
>>> will directly return.
>>>
>>> CC_EVENT will only trigger drp toggling again.
>>> ---
>>> drivers/usb/typec/tcpm/tcpm.c | 3 +--
>>> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 2 deletions(-)
>>>
>>> diff --git a/drivers/usb/typec/tcpm/tcpm.c b/drivers/usb/typec/tcpm/tcpm.c
>>> index a48e3f90..5c73e1d 100644
>>> --- a/drivers/usb/typec/tcpm/tcpm.c
>>> +++ b/drivers/usb/typec/tcpm/tcpm.c
>>> @@ -2797,8 +2797,7 @@ static void tcpm_detach(struct tcpm_port *port)
>>> port->tcpc->set_bist_data(port->tcpc, false);
>>> }
>>>
>>> - if (tcpm_port_is_disconnected(port))
>>> - port->hard_reset_count = 0;
>>> + port->hard_reset_count = 0;
>>>
>>
>> Doesn't that mean that the state machine will never enter
>> error recovery ?
>>
> I think it does't affect the error recovery.
> All error recovery seems to check pd_capable flag.
>
>>>From my below case, it's A to C cable only. There is no USBPD contract
> will be estabilished.
>
> This case occurred following by the below test condition
> Cable -> A to C (default Rp bind to vbus) connected to PC.
> 1. first time plugged in the cable with PC
> It will make HARD_RESET_COUNT to be equal 2
> 2. And then plug out. At that time HARD_RESET_COUNT is till 2.
> 3. next time plugged in again.
> Due to hard_reset_count is still 2 , after wait_cap_timeout, the state
> eventually changed to SNK_READY.
> But during the state transition, no hard_reset be sent.
>
> Defined in the USBPD policy engine, typec transition to USBPD, all
> variables must be reset included hard_reset_count.
> So it expected SNK must send hard_reset again.
>
> The original code defined hard_reset_count must be reset only when
> tcpm_port_is_disconnected.
>
> It doesn't make sense that it only occurred in some scenario.
> If tcpm_detach is called, hard_reset count must be reset also.
>
If a hard reset fails, the state machine may cycle through states
HARD_RESET_SEND, HARD_RESET_START, SRC_HARD_RESET_VBUS_OFF,
SRC_HARD_RESET_VBUS_ON back to SRC_UNATTACHED. In this state,
tcpm_src_detach() and with it tcpm_detach() is called. The hard
reset counter is incremented in HARD_RESET_SEND. If tcpm_detach()
resets the counter, the state machine will keep cycling through hard
resets without ever entering the error recovery state. I am not
entirely sure where the counter should be reset, but tcpm_detach()
seems to be the wrong place.
Guenter
>> Guenter
>>
>>> tcpm_reset_port(port);
>>> }
>>> --
>>> 2.7.4
>>>
Powered by blists - more mailing lists