[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <f6b04ff269d3f5f72ee6b005bb97e6ac7b73b43e.camel@linux.ibm.com>
Date: Fri, 04 Sep 2020 17:07:08 -0400
From: Mimi Zohar <zohar@...ux.ibm.com>
To: Bruno Meneguele <bmeneg@...hat.com>,
linux-integrity@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 3/4] ima: limit secure boot feedback scope for
appraise
Hi Bruno,
> + bool sb_state = arch_ima_get_secureboot();
> + int appraisal_state = ima_appraise;
>
> if (strncmp(str, "off", 3) == 0)
> - ima_appraise = 0;
> + appraisal_state = 0;
> else if (strncmp(str, "log", 3) == 0)
> - ima_appraise = IMA_APPRAISE_LOG;
> + appraisal_state = IMA_APPRAISE_LOG;
> else if (strncmp(str, "fix", 3) == 0)
> - ima_appraise = IMA_APPRAISE_FIX;
> + appraisal_state = IMA_APPRAISE_FIX;
> else if (strncmp(str, "enforce", 7) == 0)
> - ima_appraise = IMA_APPRAISE_ENFORCE;
> + appraisal_state = IMA_APPRAISE_ENFORCE;
> else
> pr_err("invalid \"%s\" appraise option", str);
> +
> + /* If appraisal state was changed, but secure boot is enabled,
> + * keep its default */
> + if (sb_state) {
> + if (!(appraisal_state & IMA_APPRAISE_ENFORCE))
> + pr_info("Secure boot enabled: ignoring ima_appraise=%s option",
> + str);
> + else
> + ima_appraise = appraisal_state;
> + }
Shouldn't the "else" clause be here. No need to re-post the entire
patch set.
thanks,
Mimi
> #endif
> return 1;
> }
Powered by blists - more mailing lists