| lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
|
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Message-ID: <20200904093626.GF4392@valkosipuli.retiisi.org.uk>
Date: Fri, 4 Sep 2020 12:36:26 +0300
From: Sakari Ailus <sakari.ailus@....fi>
To: Jacopo Mondi <jacopo@...ndi.org>
Cc: Laurent Pinchart <laurent.pinchart@...asonboard.com>,
Lad Prabhakar <prabhakar.mahadev-lad.rj@...renesas.com>,
Mauro Carvalho Chehab <mchehab@...nel.org>,
Hans Verkuil <hverkuil@...all.nl>, linux-media@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-renesas-soc@...r.kernel.org,
Biju Das <biju.das.jz@...renesas.com>,
Prabhakar <prabhakar.csengg@...il.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 1/2] media: i2c: ov772x: Add support for BT656 mode
On Fri, Sep 04, 2020 at 11:20:49AM +0200, Jacopo Mondi wrote:
> Hi Sakari,
>
> On Fri, Sep 04, 2020 at 11:21:04AM +0300, Sakari Ailus wrote:
> > Hi Laurent, Jacopo,
> >
> > On Fri, Sep 04, 2020 at 09:55:53AM +0200, Jacopo Mondi wrote:
> > > Hi Laurent,
> > >
> > > On Fri, Sep 04, 2020 at 04:20:00AM +0300, Laurent Pinchart wrote:
> > > > Hi Prabhakar,
> > > >
> > > > Thank you for the patch.
> > > >
> > > > On Mon, Aug 24, 2020 at 08:04:05PM +0100, Lad Prabhakar wrote:
> > > > > Add support to read the bus-type and enable BT656 mode if needed.
> > > > >
> > > > > Also fail probe if unsupported bus_type is detected.
> > > > >
> > > > > Signed-off-by: Lad Prabhakar <prabhakar.mahadev-lad.rj@...renesas.com>
> > > > > Reviewed-by: Biju Das <biju.das.jz@...renesas.com>
> > > > > ---
> > > > > drivers/media/i2c/ov772x.c | 32 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
> > > > > 1 file changed, 32 insertions(+)
> > > > >
> > > > > diff --git a/drivers/media/i2c/ov772x.c b/drivers/media/i2c/ov772x.c
> > > > > index 2cc6a678069a..67764d647526 100644
> > > > > --- a/drivers/media/i2c/ov772x.c
> > > > > +++ b/drivers/media/i2c/ov772x.c
> > > > > @@ -31,6 +31,7 @@
> > > > > #include <media/v4l2-ctrls.h>
> > > > > #include <media/v4l2-device.h>
> > > > > #include <media/v4l2-event.h>
> > > > > +#include <media/v4l2-fwnode.h>
> > > > > #include <media/v4l2-image-sizes.h>
> > > > > #include <media/v4l2-subdev.h>
> > > > >
> > > > > @@ -434,6 +435,7 @@ struct ov772x_priv {
> > > > > #ifdef CONFIG_MEDIA_CONTROLLER
> > > > > struct media_pad pad;
> > > > > #endif
> > > > > + struct v4l2_fwnode_endpoint ep;
> > > > > };
> > > > >
> > > > > /*
> > > > > @@ -581,6 +583,13 @@ static int ov772x_s_stream(struct v4l2_subdev *sd, int enable)
> > > > > if (priv->streaming == enable)
> > > > > goto done;
> > > > >
> > > > > + if (priv->ep.bus_type == V4L2_MBUS_BT656) {
> > > > > + ret = regmap_update_bits(priv->regmap, COM7, ITU656_ON_OFF,
> > > > > + enable ? ITU656_ON_OFF : ~ITU656_ON_OFF);
> > > > > + if (ret)
> > > > > + goto done;
> > > > > + }
> > > > > +
> > > > > ret = regmap_update_bits(priv->regmap, COM2, SOFT_SLEEP_MODE,
> > > > > enable ? 0 : SOFT_SLEEP_MODE);
> > > > > if (ret)
> > > > > @@ -1354,6 +1363,7 @@ static const struct v4l2_subdev_ops ov772x_subdev_ops = {
> > > > >
> > > > > static int ov772x_probe(struct i2c_client *client)
> > > > > {
> > > > > + struct fwnode_handle *endpoint;
> > > > > struct ov772x_priv *priv;
> > > > > int ret;
> > > > > static const struct regmap_config ov772x_regmap_config = {
> > > > > @@ -1415,6 +1425,28 @@ static int ov772x_probe(struct i2c_client *client)
> > > > > goto error_clk_put;
> > > > > }
> > > > >
> > > > > + endpoint = fwnode_graph_get_next_endpoint(dev_fwnode(&client->dev),
> > > > > + NULL);
> > > > > + if (!endpoint) {
> > > > > + dev_err(&client->dev, "endpoint node not found\n");
> > > > > + ret = -EINVAL;
> > > > > + goto error_clk_put;
> > > > > + }
> > > > > +
> > > > > + ret = v4l2_fwnode_endpoint_parse(endpoint, &priv->ep);
> > > >
> > > > v4l2_fwnode_endpoint_parse() is deprecated for new drivers,
> > > > v4l2_fwnode_endpoint_alloc_parse() is recommended instead. Please note
> > > > that v4l2_fwnode_endpoint_free() then needs to be called in the error
> > > > path and in remove().
> > >
> > > Doesn't alloc_parse() differ from just _parse() as it reserve space
> > > for the 'link-frequencies' array ? As this device does not support
> > > CSI-2 and the 'link-frequencies' property is not allows in bindings,
> > > isn't using endpoint_parse() better as it saves a call to _free() ?
> >
> > Yeah. I think the documentation needs to be updated.
> >
> > The thinking was there would be other variable size properties that drivers
> > would need but that didn't happen. So feel free to continue use
> > v4l2_fwnode_endpoint_parse() where it does the job.
> >
> > >
> > > Or are we deprecating that function unconditionally ? The
> > > documentation suggests "please use v4l2_fwnode_endpoint_alloc_parse()
> > > in new drivers" but here it doesn't seem required..
> > >
> > > >
> > > > On the other hand, not setting .bus_type and letting the parse()
> > > > function determine the but type automatically is also deprecated, and I
> > > > don't think forcing drivers to call v4l2_fwnode_endpoint_alloc_parse()
> > > > once for each bus type until one succeeds is a good API. As change will
> > > > be needed in that API, you can ignore v4l2_fwnode_endpoint_alloc_parse()
> > > > for the time being if you want.
> > >
> > > But indeed relying on auto-guessing of the bus type is deprecated since
> > > some time now (and the API could be improved, yes). Sorry I missed
> > > that yesterday.
> >
> > There's one case where the bus type does not need to be set: when bindings
> > require it *and* at the same time you have no default configuration that
> > requires something to be set in the bus specific struct. Bindings where
> > bus-type is required were added later so I think the documentation should
> > be changed there, too.
> >
> > I can send the patches.
> >
> > >
> > > As we support parallel and bt.656 only I must be honest I don't mind
> > > it here as otherwise the code would be more complex for no real gain,
> > > but I defer this to Sakari which has been fighting the battle against
> > > auto-guessing since a long time now :)
> >
> > I think you should require bus-type property in bindings in that case.
> >
> > But as it's an existing driver, bus-type will be optional. You'll need to
> > default to what was supported earlier. This is actually an interesting case
> > as bindings do not document it.
>
> For reference:
> https://patchwork.linuxtv.org/project/linux-media/patch/20200903131029.18334-3-jacopo+renesas@jmondi.org/
>
> But yes, we might have DTBs in the wild without bus-type specified :(
Shouldn't that be then that the bus-type is optional and defaults to
parallel?
--
Sakari Ailus
Powered by blists - more mailing lists