lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date:   Fri, 4 Sep 2020 02:16:18 +0000
From:   "Tian, Kevin" <kevin.tian@...el.com>
To:     Lu Baolu <baolu.lu@...ux.intel.com>, Joerg Roedel <joro@...tes.org>
CC:     "Raj, Ashok" <ashok.raj@...el.com>,
        "linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        "iommu@...ts.linux-foundation.org" <iommu@...ts.linux-foundation.org>
Subject: RE: [PATCH v2 1/1] iommu/vt-d: Use device numa domain if RHSA is
 missing

> From: Lu Baolu
> Sent: Friday, September 4, 2020 9:03 AM
> 
> If there are multiple NUMA domains but the RHSA is missing in ACPI/DMAR
> table, we could default to the device NUMA domain as fall back. This could
> also benefit a vIOMMU use case where only single vIOMMU is exposed,
> hence
> no RHSA will be present but device numa domain can be correct.

My comment on this is not fixed. It is not restricted to single-vIOMMU situation.
and actually this may also happen on physical platform if some FW doesn't
provide RHSA information.

with that being fixed:

Reviewed-by: Kevin Tian <kevin.tian@...el.com>

> 
> Cc: Jacob Pan <jacob.jun.pan@...ux.intel.com>
> Cc: Kevin Tian <kevin.tian@...el.com>
> Cc: Ashok Raj <ashok.raj@...el.com>
> Signed-off-by: Lu Baolu <baolu.lu@...ux.intel.com>
> ---
>  drivers/iommu/intel/iommu.c | 37
> +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++--
>  1 file changed, 35 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
> 
> Change log:
> v1->v2:
>   - Add a comment as suggested by Kevin.
>     https://lore.kernel.org/linux-
> iommu/MWHPR11MB1645E6D6BD1EFDFA139AA37C8C520@...PR11MB1
> 645.namprd11.prod.outlook.com/
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/iommu/intel/iommu.c b/drivers/iommu/intel/iommu.c
> index 7f844d1c8cd9..69d5a87188f4 100644
> --- a/drivers/iommu/intel/iommu.c
> +++ b/drivers/iommu/intel/iommu.c
> @@ -698,12 +698,47 @@ static int
> domain_update_iommu_superpage(struct dmar_domain *domain,
>  	return fls(mask);
>  }
> 
> +static int domain_update_device_node(struct dmar_domain *domain)
> +{
> +	struct device_domain_info *info;
> +	int nid = NUMA_NO_NODE;
> +
> +	assert_spin_locked(&device_domain_lock);
> +
> +	if (list_empty(&domain->devices))
> +		return NUMA_NO_NODE;
> +
> +	list_for_each_entry(info, &domain->devices, link) {
> +		if (!info->dev)
> +			continue;
> +
> +		/*
> +		 * There could possibly be multiple device numa nodes as
> devices
> +		 * within the same domain may sit behind different IOMMUs.
> There
> +		 * isn't perfect answer in such situation, so we select first
> +		 * come first served policy.
> +		 */
> +		nid = dev_to_node(info->dev);
> +		if (nid != NUMA_NO_NODE)
> +			break;
> +	}
> +
> +	return nid;
> +}
> +
>  /* Some capabilities may be different across iommus */
>  static void domain_update_iommu_cap(struct dmar_domain *domain)
>  {
>  	domain_update_iommu_coherency(domain);
>  	domain->iommu_snooping =
> domain_update_iommu_snooping(NULL);
>  	domain->iommu_superpage =
> domain_update_iommu_superpage(domain, NULL);
> +
> +	/*
> +	 * If RHSA is missing, we should default to the device numa domain
> +	 * as fall back.
> +	 */
> +	if (domain->nid == NUMA_NO_NODE)
> +		domain->nid = domain_update_device_node(domain);
>  }
> 
>  struct context_entry *iommu_context_addr(struct intel_iommu *iommu, u8
> bus,
> @@ -5096,8 +5131,6 @@ static struct iommu_domain
> *intel_iommu_domain_alloc(unsigned type)
>  		if (type == IOMMU_DOMAIN_DMA)
>  			intel_init_iova_domain(dmar_domain);
> 
> -		domain_update_iommu_cap(dmar_domain);
> -
>  		domain = &dmar_domain->domain;
>  		domain->geometry.aperture_start = 0;
>  		domain->geometry.aperture_end   =
> --
> 2.17.1
> 
> _______________________________________________
> iommu mailing list
> iommu@...ts.linux-foundation.org
> https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/iommu

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ