[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20200904002812.7300-1-chris.packham@alliedtelesis.co.nz>
Date: Fri, 4 Sep 2020 12:28:12 +1200
From: Chris Packham <chris.packham@...iedtelesis.co.nz>
To: broonie@...nel.org, npiggin@...il.com, hkallweit1@...il.com
Cc: linux-spi@...r.kernel.org, linuxppc-dev@...ts.ozlabs.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
Chris Packham <chris.packham@...iedtelesis.co.nz>,
stable@...r.kernel.org
Subject: [PATCH] spi: fsl-espi: Only process interrupts for expected events
The SPIE register contains counts for the TX FIFO so any time the irq
handler was invoked we would attempt to process the RX/TX fifos. Use the
SPIM value to mask the events so that we only process interrupts that
were expected.
This was a latent issue exposed by commit 3282a3da25bd ("powerpc/64:
Implement soft interrupt replay in C").
Signed-off-by: Chris Packham <chris.packham@...iedtelesis.co.nz>
Cc: stable@...r.kernel.org
---
Notes:
I've tested this on a T2080RDB and a custom board using the T2081 SoC. With
this change I don't see any spurious instances of the "Transfer done but
SPIE_DON isn't set!" or "Transfer done but rx/tx fifo's aren't empty!" messages
and the updates to spi flash are successful.
I think this should go into the stable trees that contain 3282a3da25bd but I
haven't added a Fixes: tag because I think 3282a3da25bd exposed the issue as
opposed to causing it.
drivers/spi/spi-fsl-espi.c | 5 +++--
1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/spi/spi-fsl-espi.c b/drivers/spi/spi-fsl-espi.c
index 7e7c92cafdbb..cb120b68c0e2 100644
--- a/drivers/spi/spi-fsl-espi.c
+++ b/drivers/spi/spi-fsl-espi.c
@@ -574,13 +574,14 @@ static void fsl_espi_cpu_irq(struct fsl_espi *espi, u32 events)
static irqreturn_t fsl_espi_irq(s32 irq, void *context_data)
{
struct fsl_espi *espi = context_data;
- u32 events;
+ u32 events, mask;
spin_lock(&espi->lock);
/* Get interrupt events(tx/rx) */
events = fsl_espi_read_reg(espi, ESPI_SPIE);
- if (!events) {
+ mask = fsl_espi_read_reg(espi, ESPI_SPIM);
+ if (!(events & mask)) {
spin_unlock(&espi->lock);
return IRQ_NONE;
}
--
2.28.0
Powered by blists - more mailing lists