lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <87imctoinr.fsf@vitty.brq.redhat.com>
Date:   Fri, 04 Sep 2020 14:01:12 +0200
From:   Vitaly Kuznetsov <vkuznets@...hat.com>
To:     Haiwei Li <lihaiwei.kernel@...il.com>
Cc:     "hpa\@zytor.com" <hpa@...or.com>, "bp\@alien8.de" <bp@...en8.de>,
        "mingo\@redhat.com" <mingo@...hat.com>,
        "tglx\@linutronix.de" <tglx@...utronix.de>, joro@...tes.org,
        "jmattson\@google.com" <jmattson@...gle.com>,
        "wanpengli\@tencent.com" <wanpengli@...cent.com>,
        sean.j.christopherson@...el.com,
        "pbonzini\@redhat.com" <pbonzini@...hat.com>,
        "linux-kernel\@vger.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        "kvm\@vger.kernel.org" <kvm@...r.kernel.org>,
        "x86\@kernel.org" <x86@...nel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] KVM: SVM: Add tracepoint for cr_interception

Haiwei Li <lihaiwei.kernel@...il.com> writes:

> From: Haiwei Li <lihaiwei@...cent.com>
>
> Add trace_kvm_cr_write and trace_kvm_cr_read for svm.
>
> Signed-off-by: Haiwei Li <lihaiwei@...cent.com>
> ---
>   arch/x86/kvm/svm/svm.c | 2 ++
>   1 file changed, 2 insertions(+)
>
> diff --git a/arch/x86/kvm/svm/svm.c b/arch/x86/kvm/svm/svm.c
> index 03dd7bac8034..2c6dea48ba62 100644
> --- a/arch/x86/kvm/svm/svm.c
> +++ b/arch/x86/kvm/svm/svm.c
> @@ -2261,6 +2261,7 @@ static int cr_interception(struct vcpu_svm *svm)

There are two special cases when we go to emulate_on_interception() and
these won't be logged but I don't think this is a must.

>   	if (cr >= 16) { /* mov to cr */
>   		cr -= 16;
>   		val = kvm_register_read(&svm->vcpu, reg);
> +		trace_kvm_cr_write(cr, val);
>   		switch (cr) {
>   		case 0:
>   			if (!check_selective_cr0_intercepted(svm, val))
> @@ -2306,6 +2307,7 @@ static int cr_interception(struct vcpu_svm *svm)
>   			return 1;
>   		}
>   		kvm_register_write(&svm->vcpu, reg, val);
> +		trace_kvm_cr_read(cr, val);

The 'default:' case above does 'return 1;' so we won't get the trace but
I understand you put trace_kvm_cr_read() here so you can log the
returned 'val', #UD should be clearly visible. 

>   	}
>   	return kvm_complete_insn_gp(&svm->vcpu, err);
>   }
> --
> 2.18.4
>

Reviewed-by: Vitaly Kuznetsov <vkuznets@...hat.com>

-- 
Vitaly

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ