[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20200904132143.9496-3-abbotti@mev.co.uk>
Date: Fri, 4 Sep 2020 14:21:43 +0100
From: Ian Abbott <abbotti@....co.uk>
To: linux-input@...r.kernel.org
Cc: David Rheinsberg <david.rheinsberg@...il.com>,
Jiri Kosina <jikos@...nel.org>,
Benjamin Tissoires <benjamin.tissoires@...hat.com>,
Ian Abbott <abbotti@....co.uk>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: [PATCH 2/2] HID: wiimote: narrow spinlock range in wiimote_hid_event()
In `wiimote_hid_event()`, the `wdata->state.lock` spinlock does not need
to be held while searching `handlers[]` for a suitable handler function.
Change it so the spinlock is only held during the call to the handler
function itself.
Signed-off-by: Ian Abbott <abbotti@....co.uk>
---
drivers/hid/hid-wiimote-core.c | 6 ++----
1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/hid/hid-wiimote-core.c b/drivers/hid/hid-wiimote-core.c
index e03a0ba5611a..41012681cafd 100644
--- a/drivers/hid/hid-wiimote-core.c
+++ b/drivers/hid/hid-wiimote-core.c
@@ -1625,12 +1625,12 @@ static int wiimote_hid_event(struct hid_device *hdev, struct hid_report *report,
if (size < 1)
return -EINVAL;
- spin_lock_irqsave(&wdata->state.lock, flags);
-
for (i = 0; handlers[i].id; ++i) {
h = &handlers[i];
if (h->id == raw_data[0] && h->size < size) {
+ spin_lock_irqsave(&wdata->state.lock, flags);
h->func(wdata, &raw_data[1]);
+ spin_unlock_irqrestore(&wdata->state.lock, flags);
break;
}
}
@@ -1639,8 +1639,6 @@ static int wiimote_hid_event(struct hid_device *hdev, struct hid_report *report,
hid_warn(hdev, "Unhandled report %hhu size %d\n", raw_data[0],
size);
- spin_unlock_irqrestore(&wdata->state.lock, flags);
-
return 0;
}
--
2.28.0
Powered by blists - more mailing lists