lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date:   Fri, 4 Sep 2020 08:40:12 -0700
From:   Florian Fainelli <f.fainelli@...il.com>
To:     André Przywara <andre.przywara@....com>,
        Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@...aro.org>
Cc:     Rob Herring <robh+dt@...nel.org>,
        "open list:OPEN FIRMWARE AND FLATTENED DEVICE TREE BINDINGS" 
        <devicetree@...r.kernel.org>, Guenter Roeck <linux@...ck-us.net>,
        Wim Van Sebroeck <wim@...ux-watchdog.org>,
        Viresh Kumar <vireshk@...nel.org>,
        LINUXWATCHDOG <linux-watchdog@...r.kernel.org>,
        "linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        Chanho Min <chanho.min@....com>,
        Liviu Dudau <liviu.dudau@....com>,
        Li Yang <leoyang.li@....com>, Shawn Guo <shawnguo@...nel.org>,
        Lorenzo Pieralisi <lorenzo.pieralisi@....com>,
        Ray Jui <rjui@...adcom.com>,
        Scott Branden <sbranden@...adcom.com>,
        bcm-kernel-feedback-list <bcm-kernel-feedback-list@...adcom.com>,
        Sudeep Holla <sudeep.holla@....com>,
        Wei Xu <xuwei5@...ilicon.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 00/10] dt-bindings: Convert SP805 to Json-schema (and fix
 users)



On 9/4/2020 8:35 AM, André Przywara wrote:
> On 04/09/2020 16:29, Florian Fainelli wrote:
> 
> Hi,
> 
>> On 9/4/2020 1:58 AM, Linus Walleij wrote:>> On Fri, Aug 28, 2020 at 9:34 PM Florian Fainelli
>>> <f.fainelli@...il.com> wrote:
>>>> On 8/28/20 6:05 AM, Andre Przywara wrote:
>>>
>>>> What is the plan for merging this series? Should Rob pick up all changes
>>>> or since those are non critical changes, should we just leave it to the
>>>> SoC maintainers to pick up the changes in their tree?
>>>
>>> What about André just send a pull request to the ARM SoC maintainers
>>> for the whole thing?
>>
>> I already applied some of the patches, if we got that route please CC me
>> so I can drop them from my local queue. Thanks
> 
> I would for sure drop these from any PR.
> 
> Rob, are you happy with the actual binding conversion? If you are
> willing to take it as it is (Viresh has already acked), I could then
> split off the DT fixes and either chase the maintainers or send ARM SoC
> a PR. But this really depends on the binding being good.

We had discussed this in an another leg of this thread that starts here:

https://lore.kernel.org/linux-devicetree/CAL_JsqKvcGAotS6xL7pu+wM8X33PLCQCuoaXYmWrA3j3OdoR5A@mail.gmail.com/
--
Florian

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ