linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v2 1/4] genirq: Walk the irq_data hierarchy when resending an interrupt

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <jhj363wxtwj.mognet@arm.com>
Date:   Sat, 05 Sep 2020 13:58:04 +0100
From:   Valentin Schneider <valentin.schneider@....com>
To:     Marc Zyngier <maz@...nel.org>
Cc:     linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org,
        Jason Cooper <jason@...edaemon.net>,
        Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>, kernel-team@...roid.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 1/4] genirq: Walk the irq_data hierarchy when resending an interrupt

On 05/09/20 10:26, Marc Zyngier wrote:
> <random>
> Maybe considering the irqchip stack along a vertical axis is the wrong
> thing to do, and that looking at it as a volume would be marginally
> better?
>
> How about innermost (close to the CPU) vs outermost (close to the
> device)?
> </random>
>

I guess this is fairly subjective, but the inner/outer thing does click
with me.

I think the "issue" with the top / bottom wording is that existing data
structures (domain / irq_data hierarchy) bias my interpretation of it, but
it's upside down from the irq_chip stack representation. That's not the
case of inner / outer where all I can think of is the actual chip layout
(i.e. as an image of the distance from the CPUs).

Anyway, that's enough psychoanalysis from me, the patches look fine - I
also reran my quick rtcwake test on GICv2 (tests the WAKEUP_ARMED
path). Feel free to add

  Reviewed-by: Valentin Schneider <valentin.schneider@....com>

to 1/4 & 3/4.

> Thanks,
>
>       M.