linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v2 1/3] dt-bindings: crypto: add new compatible for V3s

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <alpine.GSO.2.00.2009051749080.3102@dmz.c-home.cz>
Date:   Sat, 5 Sep 2020 17:51:48 +0200 (CEST)
From:   Martin Cerveny <martin@...ome.cz>
To:     Corentin Labbe <clabbe.montjoie@...il.com>
cc:     Maxime Ripard <maxime@...no.tech>,
        Martin Cerveny <m.cerveny@...puter.org>,
        Chen-Yu Tsai <wens@...e.org>,
        "David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>,
        devicetree@...r.kernel.org,
        Herbert Xu <herbert@...dor.apana.org.au>,
        linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org, linux-crypto@...r.kernel.org,
        linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, Rob Herring <robh+dt@...nel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 1/3] dt-bindings: crypto: add new compatible for V3s


On Wed, 2 Sep 2020, Corentin Labbe wrote:
> On Tue, Sep 01, 2020 at 01:40:15PM +0200, Maxime Ripard wrote:
>> On Tue, Sep 01, 2020 at 12:57:19PM +0200, Corentin Labbe wrote:
>>> On Tue, Sep 01, 2020 at 11:32:49AM +0200, Maxime Ripard wrote:
>>>> On Mon, Aug 31, 2020 at 09:30:59AM +0200, Martin Cerveny wrote:
>>>>> Like A33 "sun4i-ss" has a difference, it give SHA1 digest
>>>>> directly in BE. So add new compatible.
>>>>>
>>>>> Tested-by: Martin Cerveny <m.cerveny@...puter.org>
>>>>
>>>> The Tested-by tag is for the other developpers. You're very much
>>>> expected to have tested your patch before contributing it.
>>>>
>>>>> Signed-off-by: Martin Cerveny <m.cerveny@...puter.org>
>>>>> ---
>>>>>  .../bindings/crypto/allwinner,sun4i-a10-crypto.yaml          | 5 ++++-
>>>>>  1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
>>>>>
>>>>> diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/crypto/allwinner,sun4i-a10-crypto.yaml b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/crypto/allwinner,sun4i-a10-crypto.yaml
>>>>> index fc823572b..180efd13a 100644
>>>>> --- a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/crypto/allwinner,sun4i-a10-crypto.yaml
>>>>> +++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/crypto/allwinner,sun4i-a10-crypto.yaml
>>>>> @@ -25,6 +25,7 @@ properties:
>>>>>            - const: allwinner,sun4i-a10-crypto
>>>>>        - items:
>>>>>            - const: allwinner,sun8i-a33-crypto
>>>>> +      - const: allwinner,sun8i-v3s-crypto
>>>>
>>>> If it's compatible with the A33, why do we need to introduce a new compatible?
>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>    reg:
>>>>>      maxItems: 1
>>>>> @@ -59,7 +60,9 @@ if:
>>>>>    properties:
>>>>>      compatible:
>>>>>        contains:
>>>>> -        const: allwinner,sun6i-a31-crypto
>>>>> +        oneOf:
>>>>> +          - const: allwinner,sun6i-a31-crypto
>>>>> +          - const: allwinner,sun8i-v3s-crypto
>>>>
>>>> I guess the A33 compatible should be on that list as well?
>>>
>>> This is the list of "need reset".
>>> So we cannot use allwinner,sun8i-a33-crypto
>>> Probably this explanation should be in the commit message.
>>
>> But the A33 has a reset in the DTSI
>>
>
>
> Oh right so I need to send a fix for that and Martin Cerveny could simply use the "allwinner,sun8i-a33-crypto" (and so keep only patch #1(DTS))
>
> Regards
>

What is "right" solution for DTSI ?
- compatible = "allwinner,sun8i-a33-crypto";
OR
- compatible = "allwinner,sun8i-v3s-crypto", "allwinner,sun8i-a33-crypto";
(but unimplemented "allwinner,sun8i-v3s-crypto")

Regards