linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 5.4 00/16] 5.4.63-rc1 review

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Sun, 6 Sep 2020 09:37:00 +0200
From:   Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
To:     linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, shuah@...nel.org,
        patches@...nelci.org, lkft-triage@...ts.linaro.org,
        ben.hutchings@...ethink.co.uk, stable@...r.kernel.org,
        akpm@...ux-foundation.org, torvalds@...ux-foundation.org,
        linux@...ck-us.net
Subject: Re: [PATCH 5.4 00/16] 5.4.63-rc1 review

On Sat, Sep 05, 2020 at 10:34:58AM -0500, Dan Rue wrote:
> On Fri, Sep 04, 2020 at 03:29:53PM +0200, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:
> > This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 5.4.63 release.
> > There are 16 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response
> > to this one.  If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please
> > let me know.
> 
> Sorry for the delay - we are short handed this weekend and I got
> confused looking at results yesterday and thought we had a systems
> problem. In fact, the problem was that tags/releases weren't pushed to
> stable-rc which split-brains our results and I just forgot about that
> possibility. Is it possible on your side to automate updating the
> stable-rc repo when you publish a stable release?

Yes, I need to do that, sorry.  Will work on that this week...

> Results from Linaro’s test farm.
> No regressions on arm64, arm, x86_64, and i386.
> 
> Tested-by: Linux Kernel Functional Testing <lkft@...aro.org>

THanks for testing both of these, and sorry it crossed a weekend.

greg k-h