[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <202009060302.4574D8D0E0@keescook>
Date: Sun, 6 Sep 2020 03:06:29 -0700
From: Kees Cook <keescook@...omium.org>
To: Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>
Cc: Nick Desaulniers <ndesaulniers@...gle.com>,
Hans de Goede <hdegoede@...hat.com>,
Joe Perches <joe@...ches.com>,
Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@...nel.org>,
Yury Norov <yury.norov@...il.com>,
Arvind Sankar <nivedita@...m.mit.edu>,
Alexandru Ardelean <alexandru.ardelean@...log.com>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: [PATCH] lib/string.c: Clarify kerndoc for stpcpy()
Fix the language around return values to indicate destination instead of
source.
Reported-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@...nel.org>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/CAK7LNAQvQBhjYgSkvm-dVyNz2Jd2C2qAtfyRk-rngEDfjkc38g
Cc: Nick Desaulniers <ndesaulniers@...gle.com>
Signed-off-by: Kees Cook <keescook@...omium.org>
---
This is a fix for lib-stringc-implement-stpcpy.patch in -mm.
Andrew, please note that it would be nice to get this into -rc6
to unbreak the clang builds.
Thanks!
---
lib/string.c | 12 ++++++------
1 file changed, 6 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)
diff --git a/lib/string.c b/lib/string.c
index 6bd0cf0fb009..32a56436c7eb 100644
--- a/lib/string.c
+++ b/lib/string.c
@@ -280,12 +280,12 @@ EXPORT_SYMBOL(strscpy_pad);
* @src: pointer to the beginning of string being copied from. Must not overlap
* dest.
*
- * stpcpy differs from strcpy in a key way: the return value is the new
- * %NUL-terminated character. (for strcpy, the return value is a pointer to
- * src. This interface is considered unsafe as it doesn't perform bounds
- * checking of the inputs. As such it's not recommended for usage. Instead,
- * its definition is provided in case the compiler lowers other libcalls to
- * stpcpy.
+ * stpcpy differs from strcpy in a key way: the return value is a pointer
+ * to the new %NUL-terminated character in @dest. (For strcpy, the return
+ * value is a pointer to the start of @dest. This interface is considered
+ * unsafe as it doesn't perform bounds checking of the inputs. As such it's
+ * not recommended for usage. Instead, its definition is provided in case
+ * the compiler lowers other libcalls to stpcpy.
*/
char *stpcpy(char *__restrict__ dest, const char *__restrict__ src);
char *stpcpy(char *__restrict__ dest, const char *__restrict__ src)
--
2.25.1
--
Kees Cook
Powered by blists - more mailing lists