lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <32b89fd5-2809-ba15-9be4-f30e59decba2@arista.com>
Date:   Mon, 7 Sep 2020 18:01:42 +0100
From:   Dmitry Safonov <dima@...sta.com>
To:     Steffen Klassert <steffen.klassert@...unet.com>
Cc:     linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
        Dmitry Safonov <0x7f454c46@...il.com>,
        "David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>,
        Florian Westphal <fw@...len.de>,
        Herbert Xu <herbert@...dor.apana.org.au>,
        Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>,
        Stephen Suryaputra <ssuryaextr@...il.com>,
        netdev@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 1/6] xfrm/compat: Add 64=>32-bit messages translator

On 9/7/20 12:24 PM, Steffen Klassert wrote:
[..]
> One comment on this. Looks like the above is the same in all
> commit messages. Please provide that generic information
> with the patch 0/n and remove it from the other patches.

Yeah, I think I've used to that from x86/core submissions - they prefer
having general information copied from cover-letter to every patch, that
way commits in `git log` or `git show` preserve it.
Probably, one of small differences in style between contributions to
different subsystems. Will do, no problem.

Thanks,
          Dmitry

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ