linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v2 2/3] soc: sifive: Add SiFive specific Cadence DDR controller driver

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Mon, 7 Sep 2020 07:11:26 +0100
From:   Christoph Hellwig <hch@...radead.org>
To:     Yash Shah <yash.shah@...ive.com>
Cc:     robh+dt@...nel.org, palmer@...belt.com, paul.walmsley@...ive.com,
        bp@...en8.de, mchehab@...nel.org, tony.luck@...el.com,
        devicetree@...r.kernel.org, aou@...s.berkeley.edu,
        linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, sachin.ghadi@...ive.com,
        rrichter@...vell.com, james.morse@....com,
        linux-riscv@...ts.infradead.org, linux-edac@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 2/3] soc: sifive: Add SiFive specific Cadence DDR
 controller driver

On Mon, Sep 07, 2020 at 11:17:58AM +0530, Yash Shah wrote:
> Add a driver to manage the Cadence DDR controller present on SiFive SoCs
> At present the driver manages the EDAC feature of the DDR controller.
> Additional features may be added to the driver in future to control
> other aspects of the DDR controller.

So if this is a generic(ish) Cadence IP block shouldn't it be named
Cadence and made generic?  Or is the frontend somehow SiFive specific?