linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH] fs: align IOCB_* flags with RWF

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Mon, 7 Sep 2020 13:43:19 -0600
From:   Jens Axboe <axboe@...nel.dk>
To:     linux-fsdevel <linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org>,
        "linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Cc:     Alexander Viro <viro@...iv.linux.org.uk>,
        Jann Horn <jannh@...gle.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] fs: align IOCB_* flags with RWF_* flags

On 8/31/20 12:08 PM, Jens Axboe wrote:
> We have a set of flags that are shared between the two and inherired
> in kiocb_set_rw_flags(), but we check and set these individually.
> Reorder the IOCB flags so that the bottom part of the space is synced
> with the RWF flag space, and then we can do them all in one mask and
> set operation.
> 
> The only exception is RWF_SYNC, which needs to mark IOCB_SYNC and
> IOCB_DSYNC. Do that one separately.
> 
> This shaves 15 bytes of text from kiocb_set_rw_flags() for me.

Al, are you OK with me queueing this one up? I'm fine either way,
obviously no dependencies for this one, just want to ensure it isn't
dropped.

-- 
Jens Axboe