[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <159951413581.3126645.5011278165801551941.b4-ty@kernel.org>
Date: Mon, 7 Sep 2020 22:35:35 +0100
From: Will Deacon <will@...nel.org>
To: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org,
Valentin Schneider <valentin.schneider@....com>
Cc: catalin.marinas@....com, kernel-team@...roid.com,
Will Deacon <will@...nel.org>,
Robin Murphy <robin.murphy@....com>,
"Zengtao (B)" <prime.zeng@...ilicon.com>,
Sudeep Holla <sudeep.holla@....com>,
Jeremy Linton <Jeremy.Linton@....com>,
Dietmar Eggemann <dietmar.eggemann@....com>,
Morten Rasmussen <morten.rasmussen@....com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] arm64: topology: Stop using MPIDR for topology information
On Sat, 29 Aug 2020 14:00:16 +0100, Valentin Schneider wrote:
> In the absence of ACPI or DT topology data, we fallback to haphazardly
> decoding *something* out of MPIDR. Sadly, the contents of that register are
> mostly unusable due to the implementation leniancy and things like Aff0
> having to be capped to 15 (despite being encoded on 8 bits).
>
> Consider a simple system with a single package of 32 cores, all under the
> same LLC. We ought to be shoving them in the same core_sibling mask, but
> MPIDR is going to look like:
>
> [...]
Applied to arm64 (for-next/topology), thanks!
[1/1] arm64: topology: Stop using MPIDR for topology information
https://git.kernel.org/arm64/c/3102bc0e6ac7
Cheers,
--
Will
https://fixes.arm64.dev
https://next.arm64.dev
https://will.arm64.dev
Powered by blists - more mailing lists