[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CAMZfGtWtAYNexRq1xf=5At1+YJ+_TtN=F6bVnm9EPuqRnMuroA@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 7 Sep 2020 10:54:23 +0800
From: Muchun Song <songmuchun@...edance.com>
To: Kees Cook <keescook@...omium.org>,
Masami Hiramatsu <mhiramat@...nel.org>,
Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org>, alex.popov@...ux.com,
miguel.ojeda.sandonis@...il.com
Cc: LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] stackleak: Fix a race between stack erasing sysctl handlers
Hi all,
Any comments or suggestions? Thanks.
On Fri, Aug 28, 2020 at 11:19 AM Muchun Song <songmuchun@...edance.com> wrote:
>
> There is a race between the assignment of `table->data` and write value
> to the pointer of `table->data` in the __do_proc_doulongvec_minmax() on
> the other thread.
>
> CPU0: CPU1:
> proc_sys_write
> stack_erasing_sysctl proc_sys_call_handler
> table->data = &state; stack_erasing_sysctl
> table->data = &state;
> proc_doulongvec_minmax
> do_proc_doulongvec_minmax sysctl_head_finish
> __do_proc_doulongvec_minmax unuse_table
> i = table->data;
> *i = val; // corrupt CPU1's stack
>
> Fix this by duplicating the `table`, and only update the duplicate of
> it.
>
> Fixes: 964c9dff0091 ("stackleak: Allow runtime disabling of kernel stack erasing")
> Signed-off-by: Muchun Song <songmuchun@...edance.com>
> ---
> changelogs in v2:
> 1. Add more details about how the race happened to the commit message.
>
> kernel/stackleak.c | 11 ++++++++---
> 1 file changed, 8 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/kernel/stackleak.c b/kernel/stackleak.c
> index a8fc9ae1d03d..fd95b87478ff 100644
> --- a/kernel/stackleak.c
> +++ b/kernel/stackleak.c
> @@ -25,10 +25,15 @@ int stack_erasing_sysctl(struct ctl_table *table, int write,
> int ret = 0;
> int state = !static_branch_unlikely(&stack_erasing_bypass);
> int prev_state = state;
> + struct ctl_table dup_table = *table;
>
> - table->data = &state;
> - table->maxlen = sizeof(int);
> - ret = proc_dointvec_minmax(table, write, buffer, lenp, ppos);
> + /*
> + * In order to avoid races with __do_proc_doulongvec_minmax(), we
> + * can duplicate the @table and alter the duplicate of it.
> + */
> + dup_table.data = &state;
> + dup_table.maxlen = sizeof(int);
> + ret = proc_dointvec_minmax(&dup_table, write, buffer, lenp, ppos);
> state = !!state;
> if (ret || !write || state == prev_state)
> return ret;
> --
> 2.11.0
>
--
Yours,
Muchun
Powered by blists - more mailing lists