[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CAHp75Vcv=0c_MxTmGLTvShYMz8-JecsMpqHp4mnPWYpPM9MFLw@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 7 Sep 2020 11:25:13 +0300
From: Andy Shevchenko <andy.shevchenko@...il.com>
To: Dmitry Osipenko <digetx@...il.com>
Cc: Thierry Reding <thierry.reding@...il.com>,
Jonathan Hunter <jonathanh@...dia.com>,
Laxman Dewangan <ldewangan@...dia.com>,
Wolfram Sang <wsa@...-dreams.de>,
Michał Mirosław <mirq-linux@...e.qmqm.pl>,
linux-i2c <linux-i2c@...r.kernel.org>,
linux-tegra@...r.kernel.org,
Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v5 26/36] i2c: tegra: Factor out hardware initialization
into separate function
On Sun, Sep 6, 2020 at 9:52 PM Dmitry Osipenko <digetx@...il.com> wrote:
>
> Factor out hardware initialization into a separate function from the probe
> function. The only place where runtime PM needs to be resumed during probe
> is the place of hardware initialization, hence it makes sense to factor
> out it in order to have a bit cleaner error handling in tegra_i2c_probe().
...
> +static int tegra_i2c_init_hardware(struct tegra_i2c_dev *i2c_dev)
> +{
> + int ret;
> +
> + ret = pm_runtime_get_sync(i2c_dev->dev);
> + if (ret < 0) {
> + dev_err(i2c_dev->dev, "runtime resume failed: %d\n", ret);
refcount leak.
> + return ret;
> + }
--
With Best Regards,
Andy Shevchenko
Powered by blists - more mailing lists