[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20200907102935.GA16029@zn.tnic>
Date: Mon, 7 Sep 2020 12:29:35 +0200
From: Borislav Petkov <bp@...en8.de>
To: Fenghua Yu <fenghua.yu@...el.com>
Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>, H Peter Anvin <hpa@...or.com>,
Andy Lutomirski <luto@...nel.org>,
Jean-Philippe Brucker <jean-philippe@...aro.org>,
Christoph Hellwig <hch@...radead.org>,
Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>,
David Woodhouse <dwmw2@...radead.org>,
Lu Baolu <baolu.lu@...ux.intel.com>,
Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@...el.com>,
Tony Luck <tony.luck@...el.com>,
Ashok Raj <ashok.raj@...el.com>,
Jacob Jun Pan <jacob.jun.pan@...el.com>,
Dave Jiang <dave.jiang@...el.com>,
Sohil Mehta <sohil.mehta@...el.com>,
Ravi V Shankar <ravi.v.shankar@...el.com>,
linux-kernel <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
x86 <x86@...nel.org>, iommu@...ts.linux-foundation.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v7 8/9] x86/cpufeatures: Mark ENQCMD as disabled when
configured out
On Thu, Aug 27, 2020 at 08:06:33AM -0700, Fenghua Yu wrote:
> Currently the ENQCMD feature cannot be used if CONFIG_INTEL_IOMMU_SVM
> is not set.
IOW,
"Currently, the ENQCMD feature depends on CONFIG_INTEL_IOMMU_SVM."
?
No need for a "cannot ... if not" formulation.
--
Regards/Gruss,
Boris.
https://people.kernel.org/tglx/notes-about-netiquette
Powered by blists - more mailing lists