[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <157dbd0a-f102-3682-6122-7366c62ffaa1@pengutronix.de>
Date: Mon, 7 Sep 2020 17:33:35 +0200
From: Ahmad Fatoum <a.fatoum@...gutronix.de>
To: Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@...aro.org>
Cc: Thorsten Scherer <t.scherer@...elmann.de>,
Uwe Kleine-König <u.kleine-koenig@...gutronix.de>,
Pengutronix Kernel Team <kernel@...gutronix.de>,
Bartosz Golaszewski <bgolaszewski@...libre.com>,
"open list:GPIO SUBSYSTEM" <linux-gpio@...r.kernel.org>,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] gpio: siox: indicate exclusive support of threaded IRQs
Hello Linus,
On 8/28/20 12:55 AM, Linus Walleij wrote:
> Hi Ahmad,
>
> On Tue, Aug 4, 2020 at 11:18 AM Ahmad Fatoum <a.fatoum@...gutronix.de> wrote:
>
>> Generic GPIO consumers like gpio-keys use request_any_context_irq()
>> to request a threaded handler if irq_settings_is_nested_thread() ==
>> true or a hardirq handler otherwise.
>>
>> Drivers using handle_nested_irq() must be sure that the nested
>> IRQs were requested with threaded handlers, because the IRQ
>> is handled by calling action->thread_fn().
>>
>> The gpio-siox driver dispatches IRQs via handle_nested_irq,
>> but has irq_settings_is_nested_thread() == false.
>>
>> Set gpio_irq_chip::threaded to remedy this.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Ahmad Fatoum <a.fatoum@...gutronix.de>
>
> I think we concluded we want to apply this patch, but with
> a fixed commit text, can you send a V2? (Or ask Uwe if he wants
> to pick it up and write the text.)
Thanks for the reminder. This slipped through.
I just sent out v2 (<20200907153135.3307-1-a.fatoum@...gutronix.de>)
Cheers,
Ahmad
>
> Yours,
> Linus Walleij
>
--
Pengutronix e.K. | |
Steuerwalder Str. 21 | http://www.pengutronix.de/ |
31137 Hildesheim, Germany | Phone: +49-5121-206917-0 |
Amtsgericht Hildesheim, HRA 2686 | Fax: +49-5121-206917-5555 |
Powered by blists - more mailing lists