[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <9e270546-7962-932b-2e4c-3c833b7d4b30@siemens.com>
Date: Mon, 7 Sep 2020 17:46:37 +0200
From: Jan Kiszka <jan.kiszka@...mens.com>
To: Guenter Roeck <linux@...ck-us.net>, linux-watchdog@...r.kernel.org
Cc: Wim Van Sebroeck <wim@...ux-watchdog.org>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
"Awan, Arsalan" <Arsalan_Awan@...tor.com>,
"Hombourger, Cedric" <Cedric_Hombourger@...tor.com>,
"Farnsworth, Wade" <wade_farnsworth@...tor.com>
Subject: Re: watchdog: sp5100_tco support for AMD V/R/E series
On 07.09.20 17:31, Guenter Roeck wrote:
> On 9/7/20 4:20 AM, Jan Kiszka wrote:
>> Hi all,
>>
>> Arsalan reported that the upstream driver for sp5100_tco does not work
>> for embedded Ryzen. Meanwhile, I was able to confirm that on an R1505G:
>>
>> [ 11.607251] sp5100_tco: SP5100/SB800 TCO WatchDog Timer Driver
>> [ 11.607337] sp5100-tco sp5100-tco: Using 0xfed80b00 for watchdog MMIO address
>> [ 11.607344] sp5100-tco sp5100-tco: Watchdog hardware is disabled
>>
>> ..and fix it:
>>
>> diff --git a/drivers/watchdog/sp5100_tco.c b/drivers/watchdog/sp5100_tco.c
>> index 85e9664318c9..5482154fde42 100644
>> --- a/drivers/watchdog/sp5100_tco.c
>> +++ b/drivers/watchdog/sp5100_tco.c
>> @@ -193,7 +193,8 @@ static void tco_timer_enable(struct sp5100_tco *tco)
>> /* Set the Watchdog timer resolution to 1 sec and enable */
>> sp5100_tco_update_pm_reg8(EFCH_PM_DECODEEN3,
>> ~EFCH_PM_WATCHDOG_DISABLE,
>> - EFCH_PM_DECODEEN_SECOND_RES);
>> + EFCH_PM_DECODEEN_SECOND_RES |
>> + EFCH_PM_DECODEEN_WDT_TMREN);
>
> Confusing. The register in question is a 32-bit register, but only a byte
> is written into it. Bit 24-25 are supposed to be the resolution, bit 25-26
> set to 0 enable the watchdog. Bit 7 is supposed to enable MMIO decoding.
> This is from AMD Publication 52740. So something in the existing code
> is (or seems to be) wrong, but either case I don't see how setting bit 7
> (or 31 ?) would enable the watchdog hardware.
>
> Hmm, I wrote that code. Guess I'll need to to spend some time figuring out
> what is going on.
The logic came from [1] which inspired [2] - that's where I pointed out
the large overlap with the existing upstream driver. I would love to see
all that consolidated.
BTW, the R1505G is family 0x17. Maybe something changed there, and that
bit 7 was just reserved/ignored so far. ENOSPECS
Jan
[1]
https://git.yoctoproject.org/cgit/cgit.cgi/meta-amd/commit/meta-amd-bsp/recipes-kernel/amd-wdt/files/amd_wdt.c?id=cd760c9f04d276382a0f5156dabdb766594ace56
[2]
https://github.com/siemens/efibootguard/commit/3a702aa96d193f26571ea4e70db29ef01a0d4d5f
--
Siemens AG, Corporate Technology, CT RDA IOT SES-DE
Corporate Competence Center Embedded Linux
Powered by blists - more mailing lists