[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <f9ec5178-e38e-ed9a-25f8-21e53ccd31d1@gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 7 Sep 2020 17:31:58 +0300
From: Dmitry Osipenko <digetx@...il.com>
To: Andy Shevchenko <andy.shevchenko@...il.com>
Cc: Thierry Reding <thierry.reding@...il.com>,
Jonathan Hunter <jonathanh@...dia.com>,
Laxman Dewangan <ldewangan@...dia.com>,
Wolfram Sang <wsa@...-dreams.de>,
Michał Mirosław <mirq-linux@...e.qmqm.pl>,
linux-i2c <linux-i2c@...r.kernel.org>,
linux-tegra@...r.kernel.org,
Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v5 06/36] i2c: tegra: Runtime PM always available on Tegra
07.09.2020 11:10, Andy Shevchenko пишет:
> On Sun, Sep 6, 2020 at 9:51 PM Dmitry Osipenko <digetx@...il.com> wrote:
>>
>> The runtime PM is guaranteed to be always available on Tegra after commit
>> 40b2bb1b132a ("ARM: tegra: enforce PM requirement"). Hence let's remove
>> all the RPM-availability checking and handling from the code.
>
>> + ret = pm_runtime_get_sync(i2c_dev->dev);
>> + if (ret < 0) {
>> + dev_err(dev, "runtime resume failed\n");
>> + goto disable_rpm;
>
> As in the original code here is a refcount leak.
> Should call pm_runtime_put_noidle(). (Possible to use goto put_rpm;
> but in that case the code a bit confusing to the reader)
Good point! I already forgot about this RPM API problem! I'll add a
patch to address this.
Would be great if anyone could put effort into changing the default
get_sync() behaviour and add get_sync_nofail(). Otherwise this will be a
never ending problem.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists