lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20200908182232.GP9166@nvidia.com>
Date:   Tue, 8 Sep 2020 15:22:32 -0300
From:   Jason Gunthorpe <jgg@...dia.com>
To:     Bart Van Assche <bvanassche@....org>
CC:     Sagi Grimberg <sagi@...mberg.me>,
        Yamin Friedman <yaminf@...lanox.com>,
        kernel test robot <rong.a.chen@...el.com>,
        Max Gurtovoy <maxg@...lanox.com>,
        LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        Doug Ledford <dledford@...hat.com>,
        Jason Gunthorpe <jgg+lists@...pe.ca>,
        <linux-rdma@...r.kernel.org>, <lkp@...ts.01.org>
Subject: Re: [IB/srpt] c804af2c1d: last_state.test.blktests.exit_code.143

On Sun, Sep 06, 2020 at 07:58:12PM -0700, Bart Van Assche wrote:

> The following appeared:
> 
> WARNING: CPU: 5 PID: 1760 at drivers/infiniband/core/device.c:335 ib_device_put+0xf2/0x100 [ib_core]
> 
> Call Trace:
>  rxe_elem_release+0x76/0x90 [rdma_rxe]
>  rxe_destroy_cq+0x4f/0x70 [rdma_rxe]
>  ib_free_cq_user+0x12b/0x2b0 [ib_core]
>  ib_cq_pool_destroy+0xa8/0x140 [ib_core]
>  __ib_unregister_device+0x9c/0x1c0 [ib_core]
>  ib_unregister_driver+0x181/0x1a0 [ib_core]
>  rxe_module_exit+0x31/0x50 [rdma_rxe]
>  __x64_sys_delete_module+0x22a/0x310
>  do_syscall_64+0x36/0x80
>  entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x44/0xa9

Oh interesting..

> Do you agree that the above proves that the hang-on-unload is a
> regression that has been introduced by the cq-pool patches? Is the patch
> below a good way to fix this?

> +++ b/drivers/infiniband/core/device.c
> @@ -1454,8 +1454,8 @@ static void __ib_unregister_device(struct ib_device *ib_dev)
>  	if (!refcount_read(&ib_dev->refcount))
>  		goto out;
> 
> -	disable_device(ib_dev);
>  	ib_cq_pool_destroy(ib_dev);
> +	disable_device(ib_dev);
> 
>  	/* Expedite removing unregistered pointers from the hash table */
>  	free_netdevs(ib_dev);

Hum. Not quite..

disable_device() ensures that all ib_clients have disconnected from
the device, up until the clients have disconnected the cq_pool must
remain operational.

It is reasonable to consider the cq_pool as a built-in client, so I
would suggest moving it to right around the time the dynamic clients
are handled. Something like this:

diff --git a/drivers/infiniband/core/device.c b/drivers/infiniband/core/device.c
index c36b4d2b61e0c0..e3651dacad1da6 100644
--- a/drivers/infiniband/core/device.c
+++ b/drivers/infiniband/core/device.c
@@ -1285,6 +1285,8 @@ static void disable_device(struct ib_device *device)
 		remove_client_context(device, cid);
 	}
 
+	ib_cq_pool_destroy(ib_dev);
+
 	/* Pairs with refcount_set in enable_device */
 	ib_device_put(device);
 	wait_for_completion(&device->unreg_completion);
@@ -1328,6 +1330,8 @@ static int enable_device_and_get(struct ib_device *device)
 			goto out;
 	}
 
+	ib_cq_pool_init(device);
+
 	down_read(&clients_rwsem);
 	xa_for_each_marked (&clients, index, client, CLIENT_REGISTERED) {
 		ret = add_client_context(device, client);
@@ -1400,7 +1404,6 @@ int ib_register_device(struct ib_device *device, const char *name)
 		goto dev_cleanup;
 	}
 
-	ib_cq_pool_init(device);
 	ret = enable_device_and_get(device);
 	dev_set_uevent_suppress(&device->dev, false);
 	/* Mark for userspace that device is ready */
@@ -1455,7 +1458,6 @@ static void __ib_unregister_device(struct ib_device *ib_dev)
 		goto out;
 
 	disable_device(ib_dev);
-	ib_cq_pool_destroy(ib_dev);
 
 	/* Expedite removing unregistered pointers from the hash table */
 	free_netdevs(ib_dev);

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ