lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <159959010893.454335.18221321331314189759@swboyd.mtv.corp.google.com>
Date:   Tue, 08 Sep 2020 11:35:08 -0700
From:   Stephen Boyd <swboyd@...omium.org>
To:     Mansur Alisha Shaik <mansur@...eaurora.org>,
        linux-media@...r.kernel.org, stanimir.varbanov@...aro.org
Cc:     linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-arm-msm@...r.kernel.org,
        vgarodia@...eaurora.org,
        Mansur Alisha Shaik <mansur@...eaurora.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2] venus: core: change clk enable and disable order in resume and suspend

Quoting Mansur Alisha Shaik (2020-09-07 20:44:05)
> Currently video driver is voting after clk enable and un voting
> before clk disable. Basically we should vote before clk enable
> and un vote after clk disable.
> 
> Corrected this by changing the order of clk enable and clk disable.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Mansur Alisha Shaik <mansur@...eaurora.org>
> ---

Any Fixes: tag?

>  drivers/media/platform/qcom/venus/core.c | 17 ++++++++++-------
>  1 file changed, 10 insertions(+), 7 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/media/platform/qcom/venus/core.c b/drivers/media/platform/qcom/venus/core.c
> index c5af428..4857bbd 100644
> --- a/drivers/media/platform/qcom/venus/core.c
> +++ b/drivers/media/platform/qcom/venus/core.c
> @@ -363,13 +363,16 @@ static __maybe_unused int venus_runtime_suspend(struct device *dev)
>         if (ret)
>                 return ret;
>  
> +       if (pm_ops->core_power) {
> +               ret = pm_ops->core_power(dev, POWER_OFF);
> +               if (ret)
> +                       return ret;
> +       }
> +
>         ret = icc_set_bw(core->cpucfg_path, 0, 0);
>         if (ret)
>                 return ret;

Shouldn't we power it back up if this fails during suspend?

>  
> -       if (pm_ops->core_power)
> -               ret = pm_ops->core_power(dev, POWER_OFF);
> -
>         return ret;
>  }
>

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ