linux-kernel - Re: linux-next: Tree for Sep 8 (sched/topology.c)

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <jhj363s6ylu.mognet@arm.com>
Date:   Tue, 08 Sep 2020 17:07:41 +0100
From:   Valentin Schneider <valentin.schneider@....com>
To:     Randy Dunlap <rdunlap@...radead.org>
Cc:     Vincent Guittot <vincent.guittot@...aro.org>,
        Stephen Rothwell <sfr@...b.auug.org.au>,
        Linux Next Mailing List <linux-next@...r.kernel.org>,
        Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>,
        Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>,
        Juri Lelli <juri.lelli@...hat.com>
Subject: Re: linux-next: Tree for Sep 8 (sched/topology.c)


On 08/09/20 16:50, Randy Dunlap wrote:
> Sure, here it is again.  And
> CONFIG_SMP=y
> CONFIG_SCHED_DEBUG=y
>
> thanks.

Okay so I can reproduce that with GCC-10.1, now to figure out WTH is going on...