[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <8e28858d-e6a4-1c4f-4087-5f4a9719db94@intel.com>
Date: Tue, 8 Sep 2020 07:33:24 -0700
From: Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@...el.com>
To: Gerald Schaefer <gerald.schaefer@...ux.ibm.com>,
Jason Gunthorpe <jgg@...pe.ca>,
John Hubbard <jhubbard@...dia.com>
Cc: LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, linux-mm <linux-mm@...ck.org>,
linux-arch <linux-arch@...r.kernel.org>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>,
Russell King <linux@...linux.org.uk>,
Mike Rapoport <rppt@...nel.org>,
Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@....com>,
Will Deacon <will@...nel.org>,
Michael Ellerman <mpe@...erman.id.au>,
Benjamin Herrenschmidt <benh@...nel.crashing.org>,
Paul Mackerras <paulus@...ba.org>,
Jeff Dike <jdike@...toit.com>,
Richard Weinberger <richard@....at>,
Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@...ux.intel.com>,
Andy Lutomirski <luto@...nel.org>,
Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>, Borislav Petkov <bp@...en8.de>,
Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>,
Andrey Ryabinin <aryabinin@...tuozzo.com>,
linux-x86 <x86@...nel.org>,
linux-arm <linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>,
linux-power <linuxppc-dev@...ts.ozlabs.org>,
linux-sparc <sparclinux@...r.kernel.org>,
linux-um <linux-um@...ts.infradead.org>,
linux-s390 <linux-s390@...r.kernel.org>,
Alexander Gordeev <agordeev@...ux.ibm.com>,
Vasily Gorbik <gor@...ux.ibm.com>,
Heiko Carstens <hca@...ux.ibm.com>,
Christian Borntraeger <borntraeger@...ibm.com>,
Claudio Imbrenda <imbrenda@...ux.ibm.com>
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH v2 2/3] mm: make pXd_addr_end() functions page-table
entry aware
On 9/7/20 11:00 AM, Gerald Schaefer wrote:
> x86:
> add/remove: 0/0 grow/shrink: 2/0 up/down: 10/0 (10)
> Function old new delta
> vmemmap_populate 587 592 +5
> munlock_vma_pages_range 556 561 +5
> Total: Before=15534694, After=15534704, chg +0.00%
...
> arch/x86/mm/init_64.c | 15 ++++-----
> arch/x86/mm/kasan_init_64.c | 16 +++++-----
I didn't do a super thorough review on this, but it generally looks OK
and the benefits of sharing more code between arches certainly outweigh
a few bytes of binary growth. For the x86 bits at least, feel free to
add my ack.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists