[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <64ca7c98-4798-35c4-307e-57c4ca4cfdb2@linux.ibm.com>
Date: Tue, 8 Sep 2020 15:03:25 -0400
From: Tony Krowiak <akrowiak@...ux.ibm.com>
To: Christian Borntraeger <borntraeger@...ibm.com>,
linux-s390@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
kvm@...r.kernel.org
Cc: freude@...ux.ibm.com, cohuck@...hat.com, mjrosato@...ux.ibm.com,
pasic@...ux.ibm.com, alex.williamson@...hat.com,
kwankhede@...dia.com, fiuczy@...ux.ibm.com, frankja@...ux.ibm.com,
david@...hat.com, imbrenda@...ux.ibm.com, hca@...ux.ibm.com,
gor@...ux.ibm.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v10 03/16] s390/vfio-ap: manage link between queue struct
and matrix mdev
On 9/4/20 4:15 AM, Christian Borntraeger wrote:
> On 21.08.20 21:56, Tony Krowiak wrote:
>> diff --git a/drivers/s390/crypto/vfio_ap_private.h b/drivers/s390/crypto/vfio_ap_private.h
>> index a2aa05bec718..57da703b549a 100644
>> --- a/drivers/s390/crypto/vfio_ap_private.h
>> +++ b/drivers/s390/crypto/vfio_ap_private.h
>> @@ -87,6 +87,7 @@ struct ap_matrix_mdev {
>> struct kvm *kvm;
>> struct kvm_s390_module_hook pqap_hook;
>> struct mdev_device *mdev;
>> + DECLARE_HASHTABLE(qtable, 8);
>> };
> Ah I think the include should go into this patch. But then you should revisit the patch description
> of 2 as it talks about hashtables (but doesnt do anything about it).
Got it.
>
Powered by blists - more mailing lists